British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial

1 answer:

jeka942 years ago

5 0

New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.

<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>

New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.

India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.

Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Which act passed in Britain resulted in the first colonial boycott of British goods?

larisa [96]

I believe the answer is B

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do you collect information on the candidates and the propositions?

lesantik [10]

What subject are you learning

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 2-4 sentences, describe why compound interest earns more money than simple interest.

Semenov [28]

Simple interest is interest only calculated by multiplying the principal amount by the interest rate and the number of periods in a loan. However compound interest is interest on interest. It is calculated by multiplying the principal amount by the annual interest rate raised to the number of compound periods.
<span>

</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement is true?

Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

Eisenhower often attacked his opponents (the democrats) saying they were communist.

7 0

2 years ago

What caused the American Revolution? *

meriva

British taxation on the colonies without proper representation in Parliament

5 0

3 years ago