2 years ago

British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial

1 answer:

jeka942 years ago

5 0

New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.

<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>

New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.

India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.

Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Describe the growth and development of the rail industry and what impact it had on the growth of the nation.

Nastasia [14]

Over the years our nation has had a lot of impact by growth, considering the facts our nation is not devloping the way it should

6 0

3 years ago

In Roman times most people lived in small cities, while during the Middle Ages most people lived in the countryside. All of the

Evgen [1.6K]

C.
is the right answer i think because in the middle ages most people live in the countryside .

good luck

4 0

3 years ago

What were the living conditions of many immigrants who lived in cities? clean and well-kept dirty and crowded small and well-kep

xeze [42]

Answer:dirty and crowded

Explanation: bc it was a lot of people

3 0

3 years ago

What is one change from 1950 to 2010 that this graph

Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

<h3>D. The age gap between men and women has grown smaller over time.</h3>

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Drag each name to the correct location on the table.

Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

Creek is Muskogean, Cherokee is iroquian, Powhatan is Algonquian, and Seminole is Muskogean

I’m actually part Cherokee myself so...yea

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers