Answer and Explanation:
The consequences of given transactions are as follows
a. Revenues rise by $3.2 million as the firm received an order
b. Earnings rise by $1.5 million as the firm received an order and it filled by an orders i,e ($3.2 - $1.7)
c. Receivables rise by $1.80 million as it determines the remaining balance which ultimately increased the receivable balance
d. Inventory declined by $1.7 million as the order is filled which ultimately declines the stock
e. The cash would rise by $1.4 million
= Earnings - receivable + inventory
= $1.5 million - $1.80 million + $1.7 million
= $1.4 million
Answer: $3000
Explanation: Allowance for doubtful accounts is the contra account to accounts receiveable when all the bad debts need to be accounted for. The bad debts reduces the accounts receivable line but all bad debts are actually deducted from the allowance for doubtful accounts.
The allowance for doubtful accounts for that year is calculated as 5% of the accounts receivable balance. This amounts to $8000 (160000 x 5%) before bad debts have been accounted for. Allowance for doubtful accounts moves in the opposite direction as accounts receivable because it is a contra account to this line item. At the end of the year before year end closing entries are done, and after the bad debts have been accounted for, the balance on the allowance for doubtful accounts is $5000.
This means that bad debts for that year is:
8000 (balance before bad debts have been accounted for)
- 5000 (balance after bad debts have been accounted for)
= $3000.
Answer:
False.
You don't want to work day and night, or do something you are not willing to, just to get a bunch of money
Explanation:
Answer: d. b and c
Your analysis assumes that velocity is constant, and it is not.
Your analysis assumes that you can correctly define the money supply
Explanation:
Here are the options for the question:
a. Your analysis assumes that Real GDP is constant over time, and it is not.
b. Your analysis assumes that velocity is constant, and it is not.
c. Your analysis assumes that you can correctly define the money supply.
d. b and c
e. a, b and c
According to the constant-money-growth-rate rule, the government should target money growth rate in a way that it will be equal to growth rate of the real GDP.
The likely thing that economist Smith, who favors activist monetary policy would say to economist Jones is that Jones is assuming velocity will be constant, and is also correctly defining the money supply which should not.be the case as velocity isn't always constant.
