1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Musya8 [376]
1 year ago
9

The United States refused to participate in which international

History
1 answer:
JulijaS [17]1 year ago
4 0

Answer:

The League of Nations

Explanation:

after World War 1 president Wilson came up with the idea of a group where nations could settle conflict with international diplomacy, however Wilson stayed out of the League preffereing America to take an isolationist approach to European affairs after america lost its young men.

You might be interested in
Which kind of play is Shakespeare's Julius Caesar sometimes described as? A. a satire B. a melodrama C. a passion play D. a hist
antiseptic1488 [7]
The answer is D. A history
3 0
3 years ago
How did the right react to the new deal
chubhunter [2.5K]
They believed the new deal gave the government far too much power
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the House of Burgesses?
natulia [17]

First legislative body in Virginia (bicameral)

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The government needs to provide public goods for what reason?
Len [333]

Answer:

Public Goods - The Economic Lowdown Podcast Series

Explanation:

Is public transportation a public good? How about national defense? Knowing the characteristics of public goods will help you understand why private firms excel at producing private goods, but they have little incentive to produce public goods. Rather, if society wants public goods, government must produce them. This episode of The Economic Lowdown defines the characteristics of private and public goods and explains why these characteristics help determine who is best positioned to produce each.

[Hope's it's Help]

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 considered a victory for the Continental army? The Continental army maintained its con
Shalnov [3]

Explanation:

The Battle of Bunker Hill was fought on June 17, 1775, during the Siege of Boston in the early stages of the American Revolutionary War. The battle is named after Bunker Hill in Charlestown, Massachusetts, which was peripherally involved in the battle. It was the original objective of both the colonial and British troops, though the majority of combat took place on the adjacent hill which later became known as Breed's Hill.

On June 13, 1775, the leaders of the colonial forces besieging Boston learned that the British were planning to send troops out from the city to fortify the unoccupied hills surrounding the city, which would give them control of Boston Harbor. In response, 1,200 colonial troops under the command of William Prescott stealthily occupied Bunker Hill and Breed's Hill. During the night, the colonists constructed a strong redoubt on Breed's Hill, as well as smaller fortified lines across the Charlestown Peninsula.

By daybreak of June 17, the British became aware of the presence of colonial forces on the Peninsula and mounted an attack against them that day. Two assaults on the colonial positions were repulsed with significant British casualties; the third and final attack carried the redoubt after the defenders ran out of ammunition. The colonists retreated to Cambridge over Bunker Hill, leaving the British in control of the Peninsula.

The battle was a tactical, though somewhat Pyrrhic, victory for the British,as it proved to be a sobering experience for them, involving many more casualties than the Americans had incurred, including many officers. The battle had demonstrated that inexperienced militia were able to stand up to regular army troops in battle. Subsequently, the battle discouraged the British from any further frontal attacks against well defended front lines. American casualties were comparatively much fewer, although their losses included General Joseph Warren and Major Andrew McClary, the final casualty of the battle.

The battle led the British to adopt a more cautious planning and maneuver execution in future engagements, which was evident in the subsequent New York and New Jersey campaign, and arguably helped rather than hindered the American forces. Their new approach to battle was actually giving the Americans greater opportunity to retreat if defeat was imminent. The costly engagement also convinced the British of the need to hire substantial numbers of Hessian auxiliaries to bolster their strength in the face of the new and formidable Continental Army.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many states eventually voted in the favor of ratifying the Constitution
    12·2 answers
  • What effect did the American westward movement have on diplomatic relations with Great Britain and Spain?
    13·1 answer
  • What were the effects of the Tet Offensive at home and in Vietnam?
    6·2 answers
  • What affect did mechanization have on farming
    7·1 answer
  • Where do most mountains form and how do they form?
    5·1 answer
  • About what percentage of arson fires are set by individuals under 18
    5·1 answer
  • Who were the two leaders of Prussia that led the unification of Germany?
    10·2 answers
  • What were the Fugitive Slave Laws?
    8·1 answer
  • Which phrase best describes Stowe’s purpose in writing the novel?
    8·1 answer
  • What emboldened the women who worked in the Lowell mills and facilitated their ability to organize the strikes of the 1830s
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!