Well if your talking about today then the most prevalent is a tie between social media, and the news. But <span>if your talking about like World War l, for example, then posters were prevalent in Britain and Germany because they could target at any audience.</span>
Answer:
They used the method known as king cotton diplomacy.
Explanation:
During the American civil war, it was essential for the confederation to obtain support from England, having it as an ally in its separation plans. To force this support, the confederation used a strategy known as king cotton diplomacy, where the confederation created commercial embryos for cotton across europe if it did not get support from england and france.
I'm pretty positive it was the king of Prussia
Answer:
They supported limited government and states' rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
No
Explanation:
First of all, who would be the one giving the task?
Second of all, the people must be able to accept change for them to experience change.
Third of all, who would take on the task? Which country/people? Who would provide the resources, fundings, & volunteers to help "improve" the world.
Fourth, what kind of improvements are we talking about? Is it really beneficial, or does it just help with foreign government agendas?
Fifth, would there be any "extra's" that those parts of the world have to take on? Would they be called upon later on to help even when they cannot? Help usually have strings attached, and they would force obligation on the beneficiary to return the favor at a later time.
Of course, if the parts of the world wants to be improved, and there is the resources and funds to do so, then yes, Roosevelt is right in "improving" those parts of the world.
~
