Answer: B. Divergence.
Explanation:
Communication accommodation theory reflects on people´s inclination to adapt their behavior during an interaction to manage social differences. People adjust their communication to obtain support and create a positive image in front of others.
Convergence refers to people adapting to the other person’s communication styles to lessen the social differences, whereas divergence shows an individual that emphasizes those differences, like in this example.
The name which is given to the principle and practice of flowery, persuasive speaking is known as:
- The Flower Theory of Persuasion
<h3>What is Persuasion?</h3>
This refers to the method through which a person convinces someone to perform a particular task or do something he would otherwise not have done.
With this in mind, we can see that the Flower Theory of Persuasion is one which is a simple framework which is used to convince people using the principle of flowery and persuasive speech.
Read more about persuasion here:
brainly.com/question/8060762
The answer is: It allowed the farming society to dig up the dirt on their farms allowing a more effective and easy way to plant their crops.
The method of farming contributed by the invention of plow allow societies to produce more products with lesser amount of time (most popular one would be by combining it with animals such as buffalo or horses) . This invention help to address hunger problems that exist at that time and bring wealth and prosperity through the agricultural sectors.
Answer:
<h3>The correct answer would be the doctrine of federal preemption.</h3>
Explanation:
Clause II of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states that federal law is the "supreme law of the land." It implies that every judge of state and other courts must follow the federal laws of the Constitution.
This clause, often termed as Supremacy Clause, allow federal laws to preempt state laws, even when both the state and federal governments have concurrent authority over a particular subject.
The doctrine of federal preemption simply implies that higher court may arrogate the law of a lower court if the two authorities come into conflict.
