Answer:
There
Explanation:
there seems to be a convergence a coming together of the different storyline at this point.
Explanation:
If we use farm animals for what they are good at - converting by-products from the food system and grass resources into valuable food and manure - they can contribute significantly to human food supply, while at the same time reducing the environmental impact of the entire food system. By converting these so-called low-opportunity-cost feeds, farm animals recycle biomass and nutrients into the food system that would otherwise be lost to food production. Rearing animals under this circular paradigm, however, requires a transition from our current linear food system towards a circular one. Here we present a biophysical concept for the role of farm animals in a circular food system, essential for meeting dietary recommendations within the boundaries of our planet.
MARK AS BRAINLIST IF IT IS USEFUL
Strength is the answer ;)
Answer:
A). Nativist; Empiricist.
Explanation:
A nativist view proposes the claim that the 'perceptual development' of humans is highly inflated by the nature. Such <u>a view asserts that humans are born with certain intrinsic ability or skill to develop or learn a language/speech.</u> While the 'empiricist' perspective promotes the idea that human beings and their perceptual developments are more influenced by the external/environmental factors which include a major contribution of <u>'learning and experiences'</u>. Therefore, the former one encourages the role of 'nature' while the latter promotes the part played by 'nurture' in shaping an individual's 'intuitive/perceptual' development.
Answer: 390 to 600 milliseconds
Explanation: MIT researchers have found an answer in a new study that shows humans need about 390 to 600 milliseconds to detect and react to road hazards, given only a single glance at the road, with younger drivers detecting hazards nearly twice as fast as older drivers.
