Answer:
Nitrogen fixation by bacteria
hope it help
please mark as brainliest
The cities were very spread out, the houses weren't as close together
The answer is B. a positive self-concept
Humanistic psychology deals with the individual as a unique person. It emphasizes the role of feelings and motives relating to self-esteem. And self-esteem can only be attained through a positive self-concept.
A and C are related. Reciprocal determinism is a theory proposed by Albert Bandura that says a person's behavior is very much influenced by personal factors and his environment. External locus of control is determined by the environment. For D, it's too far from the correct answer because empirical tests are only given to validate a person's personality.
Answer:
placebo
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the sugar pill being used is known as a placebo. This term refers to substance or treatment that has no actual effect and has been designed to have no actual therapeutic value other than making individuals think that it does when used. Which in this scenario, not knowing that the pill is a sugar pill and not an actual painkiller, many individuals will still feel the effects that a painkiller pill actually provides even though they did not take one.
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
