An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
The restaurant's window was broken the chef got scared and ran out.When he ran out he forgot to close the fridge.The ants then saw the oppurtunity to get the delicious bacon and pancakes that spilled all over the floor because they were so hungry.The oven was still hot but the ants were determined to get the food.(Finish it how ever you want)
I think it is to entertain and inform, but mostly to inform.
Answer:
A fish’s gills absorb oxygen from the water. Carbon dioxide passes out into the water through the gills as waste. The water then flows out of the gills.
Explanation:
rate me brainliest
plz
Answer:
The suspense is built through the characters, who have big secrets that they all avoid revealing throughout the play. :)
Explanation:
:)
