yes
(not enough information given)
These are the antioxidants. An antioxidant is an atom that hinders the oxidation of different particles. Oxidation is a concoction response that can deliver free radicals, prompting chain responses that may harm cells.
Antioxidants agents shield the body from harm caused by unsafe atoms called free radicals. Numerous specialists trust this harm is a factor in the advancement of vein infection, tumor, and different conditions.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Recent developments in biology have made it possible to acquire more and more precise information concerning our genetic makeup. Although we have only begun to see the most far-reaching effects of these developments and the completion of the Human Genome Project, scientists can even today identify a number of genetic disorders that may cause illness and disease in their carriers. The improved knowledge regarding the human genome will, it is predicted, soon make diagnoses more accurate, treatments more effective, and thereby considerably reduce and prevent unnecessary suffering. The knowledge can also be, however, depending on the case, futile, distressing, or plainly harmful. We propose to answer in this article the dual question: who should know about our genetic makeup and why? Through an analysis of prudential, moral, and legal grounds for acquiring the information, we conclude that, at least on the levels of law and social policy, practically nobody is either duty-bound to receive or entitled to have that knowledge.
<span>
Cutting the tips of the plant stops the secretion of Auxins, which are present in the apical meristems. This stimulates the growth of the axillary and lateral buds, causing the plant to branch out.</span>
Both humans and monkeys have this. A VERY long time ago Humans had very small "strings" of skin. This skin has evolved over time and now there is a bone left. Monkeys are technically un-evolved humans. Good thing they stuck around.
