Andrew Jackson was a strict constructionist. This means that he had a strict interpretation of the United States Constitution, as opposed to a loose constructionist who had a loose interpretation of the United States Constitution. He believed that it should not be up for interpretation and should be interpreted how it is stated.
The Bank of the United States was quite a controversial topic during this time, as strict constructionists thought it was against the United States Constitution since there was nowhere in it that stated the bank could be created. On the other hand, loose constructionists did not think having a bank was unconstitutional because it was "<em>necessary and proper</em>." They would continue to use this Necessary and Proper Clause or the "<em>elastic clause</em>" to push for things that were not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
What? Your question does not make sense. Those are not African or Asian countries.
People of the classical era found the flat, open geography of the African plains particularly well suited to "<span>B. herding livestock," since this meant that there were fewer physical impairments such as mountains and rivers that could get in the way. </span>
Answer:
C. sell unoccupied lands.
Explanation:
The Indian Appropriations Act comprises of several landmark acts that were passed by the Congress of the United States of America between the 19th and 20th century.
In 1885, Congress passed an act known as the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 so as to mitigate or forestall several attempts of encroachment into the Indian Territory by the Oklahoman Boomers. Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 was mainly to avail the Indians and all Indian tribes the ability to sell any unoccupied land in their possession or have claimed to be theirs.
Hence, the Indian Appropriations Act of 1885 encouraged American Indians to sell unoccupied lands.