Answer:
B) You have to move that piece over there to make it look even. Here, let me show you.
Explanation:
B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.
Answer:
Yes! What did you need help with?
Explanation:
I'm not really the best when it comes to answering questions like this but i would say based on what paragraph 3 said
the answer would be D
I hope you get it right
198/11=18 or to get the answer you just multiply 18 times 11
