Answer:
Abraham Maslow
Explanation:
Maslow's famous hierarchy of needs, proposed by American psychologist Abraham H. Maslow, is based on the idea that every human being strives hard to meet his or her personal and professional needs. It is a scheme that has a hierarchical division in which the needs considered lower level must be met before the needs higher level. According to this theory, each individual has to perform a hierarchical "escalation" of needs to achieve their full self-realization.
Foreshadowing maybe i don't know
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
This is an example of paraphrasing the speaker’ idea.
Explanation:
Paraphrasing refers to the usage of your own words and expressions that communicate the exact meaning of what is originally spoken or written. It must be relevant and it must not convey any controversial or biased opinion which may result in conflict. Here Matthias had paraphrased the idea of Shonda by using his own words and expressions which conveyed the exact meaning of what Shonda felt.
Paraphrasing is different than summarizing. Paraphrasing enables the person to use his own choice of words without altering the meaning of the original content whereas summarizing refers to a brief of value points from the lengthy content.
I believe the answer is: hindsight bias
an example of an hindsight bias would be when a supporter of a certain fighter react when he deliver a knockout blow to an equally strong opponent and say
<em>'see, i told you he can win this easily' </em>
Even though his statement might appear to be true, there he would not be able to provide objective evidence on his statement since the opponent could very much do the same on different fight.