It is a true statement that the three-fifths compromise lasted until the fourteenth amendment declared that everyone would be counted as a whole person.
<h3>
What was the three-fifths compromise?</h3>
It was the compromise agreement between delegates from the North and South at the Constitutional Convention (1787) that the three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.
However, this method of counting 3/5 of slaves for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives lasted until the fourteenth amendment declared that everyone would be counted as a whole person.
Read more about three-fifths compromise
brainly.com/question/535544
#SPJ1
Answer:
Bulimia
Explanation:
Bulimia is an emotional disorder based on distortion of body image and an obsessive desire to lose weight, in which bouts of extreme over eating are followed by depression and self-induced vomiting, purging, or fasting. Therefore the answer would be Rachel would most likely be diagnosed with bulimia. Hope this helps.
Answer:
hypokalemia
Explanation:
Furosemide (Lasix diuretics) is a potent diuretic that if administered in excessive amounts, can produce deep diuresis with loss of water and electrolytes. Excessive diuresis can cause hypokalemia, which causes the muscles to weaken, experience cramping or shaking and also lead to arrhythmias.
The factors that led to this conclusion were, among others, the supply of this medicine, the patient's symptoms and the poor diet she was carrying. The recommendation is to have a diet rich in potassium (foods such as bananas, raisins, plums, pears, etc.) and if required, the provision of oral potassium supplements.
Answer:Universal suffrage (also called universal franchise, general suffrage, and common suffrage of the common man) gives the right to vote to all adult citizens, regardless of wealth, income, gender, social status, race, ethnicity, political stance, or any other restriction, subject only to relatively minor exceptions.[1][2] In its original 19th-century usage by reformers in Britain, universal suffrage was understood to mean only universal manhood suffrage; the vote was extended to women later, during the women's suffrage movement.[3][4]
There are variations among countries in terms of specifics of the right to vote; the minimum age is usually between 18 and 25 years (see age of majority) and "the insane, certain classes of convicted criminals, and those punished for certain electoral offenses" sometimes lack the right to vote.[2]
In the first modern democracies, governments restricted the vote to those with property and wealth, which almost always meant a minority of the male population.[5] In some jurisdictions, other restrictions existed, such as requiring voters to practice a given religion.[6] In all modern democracies, the number of people who could vote has increased progressively with time.[7][8] The 19th century saw many movements advocating "universal [male] suffrage", most notably in Europe, Great Britain and North America.[9][7]
Explanation:
Answer: the affluent society.
<em>The Affluent Society</em> is a book by economist John Kenneth Galbraith, in which he describes the way in which the United States' economy operated in the 1950s. He argues that the country became wealthy in the private sector but poor in the public sector. Galbraith argued that the government needed to invest on social infrastructure using funds from taxation if it wanted to remain ahead.
