All categories

2 years ago

One positive impact that industrialization has had is that.

1 answer:

3 0

One positive impact that industrialization has had is that industrialization has been a source of many jobs for people.

<h3>What is industrialization?</h3>

Industrialization refers to the development of industries in a country or region on a wide scale.

One positive impact that industrialization has had is that industrialization has been a source of many jobs for the people.

Learn more about Industrialization here:

brainly.com/question/12798533

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Sister Pools sells outdoor swimming pools and currently has an aftertax cost of capital of 11.6 percent. Al's Construction build

Aloiza [94]

Answer:

$1,952 (Positive NPV)

Explanation:

Year Annual CF ($) PV factor at 10.30% PV of Cash Flow ($)

1 17,000 0.90662 15,413

2 17,000 0.82196 13,973

3 17,000 0.74520 12,668

4 17,000 0.67561 11,485

5 17,000 0.61252 10,413

6 17,000 0.55532 9,441

7 17,000 0.50347 8,559

TOTAL 1.73554 81,952

Net Present Value (NPV) = Present value of annual cash flows - Initial Cost

Net Present Value (NPV) = $81,952 - $80,000

Net Present Value (NPV) = $1,952 (Positive NPV)

8 0

3 years ago

Carter Corporation made sales of $ 825 million during 2018. Of this amount, Carter collected cash for $ 710 million. The compa

salantis [7]

Answer:

Part (a) The net income of carter is $115 million.

Part (b) The closing cash balance at the end of year is $360.

Explanation:

Part (a) Net Income Computation:

Sales $825

Cost of goods sold ($290)

Gross Profit $535

Other Expenses ($425)

Net income $115 Million

Part (b) The cash balance of Carter is not dependent on non cash flows. So the cash transactions would be considered here for cash balance computation.

Opening Cash position $290

Collection from Sales $710

Inventory Invoices paid ($350)

For Everything ($290)

Closing Cash balance $360

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is not generally regarded as a legitimate reason for gov't to intervene in a market?

Bess [88]

Answer:

C. To enforce property rights

Explanation:

Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.

Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .

Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .

Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .

Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .

However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .

But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose labor's share of output is 60% and capital's share of output is 40%. If labor grows at a rate of 5%, then this will caus

12345 [234]

If capital grows at a rate of 5%, then this will cause output to grow at a rate of 1%.

Given,

Labor's share of output = 60%

Capital's share of output = 40%

Labor grows on a rate of = 5%

Capital grows on a rate of = 5%

Thus, output will grow at a rate of = ?

SR(t) = Δy/Δt/Y - (αΔk/Δt/k(t) + (1-α)(ΔL/Δt/L(t))

Here, α = 60%

So, labor's share = (1 - 0.6) × 5 = 2%

Capitals contribution = 0.4 × 5 = 2%

Implied rate of growth in technology is also given,

SR = (5) - (2+2)

= 1%

Hence, if capital grows at a rate of 5%, then this will cause output to grow at a rate of 1%.

To learn more about capital here:

brainly.com/question/24212838

#SPJ1

8 0

1 year ago

Lucie is reviewing a project with an initial cost of $38,700 and cash inflows of $9,800, $16,400, and $21,700 for Years 1 to 3,

Alecsey [184]

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

To determine whether the project should be accepted or not, we need to calculate the net present value. If the NPV is positive, the project should be accepted.

To calculate the NPV, we will use the following formula:

NPV= -Io + ∑[Cf/(1+i)^n]

Cf1= 9,800/1.0975= 8,929.38

Cf2= 16,400/1.0975^2= 13,615.54

Cf3= 21,700/1.0975^3= 16,415.20

Total= $38,960.12

NPV= -38,700 + 38,960.12

NPV= 260.12

The project is profitable.

5 0

3 years ago