Answer:
The present value of this cash flow will be decreased following the increase in the interest rate.
Explanation:
We have the formula for calculating present value is:
PV = FV / ( 1+r)^n
where:
PV is the present value
FV is the future value which is $10,000 in the described question
r is the discount rate which is the interest rate
n is the number of discounting periods which is one year in the described question
So, once the interest rate increase, the denominator - (1+r)^n - will increase. Then, if FV remains constant, PV will decrease.
So, The present value of this cash flow will be decreased following the increase in the interest rate.
Answer:
Firms may be inclined to keep their workers’ wages above the equilibrium level.
Explanation:
The efficiency wage theory states that if an employer increases the wage of his/her employees, they will be motivated and their productivity will increase. The increase in productivity should offset the increased labor costs. So the costs of higher wages should be recouped through increased productivity. Higher wages also reduce worker turnover, reducing hiring and training costs.
Answer:
b. In the first economy, the spending multiplier is greater than in the second economy. In the third economy, the spending multiplier is undefined
Explanation:
This can be easily understood by going through some calculations in a spending multiplier formula.
WORKINGS
The formula for Spending Multiplier =
Spending Multiplier
Economy 1: Multiplier = = 2
Economy 2: Multiplier = = 1
Economy 3: Multiplier = = undefined
Note: MPS can be abbreviated as Marginal propensity to save
As we can see here economy 1 is 50% greater than economy 2 and economy 3 is undefined because they spend whole dollar they earn additionally.
On behalf of the above calculations, option B is a perfect match!
Answer:
$23,400
Explanation:
Amortization expense = Cost of the patent/ useful life
$23,400 / 10 = $23,400
The amortization expense each year is $23,400.
I hope my answer helps you
E, if there was enough for everyone if wouldn’t be scarce.