Explanation:
The history of Ottoman–Safavid relations (Persian: روابط عثمانی و صفوی) started with the establishment of Safavid dynasty in Persia (Iran) in the early 16th century. The initial Ottoman–Safavid conflict culminated in the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514, and was followed by a century of border confrontation. In 1639, Safavid Persia and Ottoman Empire signed the Treaty of Zuhab which recognized Iraq in Ottoman control, and decisively parted the Caucasus in two between the two empires. For most of it, the Zuhab treaty was a consolidation of the Peace of Amasya of about a century earlier.[1]
Persian and Ottoman Empire in 1661
Until the 18th century, the struggle between the Safavid version of Shia Islam and the Ottoman Turkish version of Sunni Islam had continued to remain an important dimension of the combative relationships between the two major empires.[2] In the early 18th century, Persian–Ottoman peace negotiations introduced a new concept of inter-Muslim relations whereby sovereign states could co-exist as autonomous parts of the Islamic world community.[3] Although the further relations were guided by the mutual fear of weakness and distrust, it wasn't until 1847 when Qajar Persia and Ottoman Empire reached a substantial peace Treaty of Erzurum, starting a century of peace,[2] after centuries of rivalry.
The International Monetary Fund and the World bank are similar by the way they both fight poverty in developing countries.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank fight to raise the living standards of the developing nations. The IMF provides support and advice to the countries as of how to develop the economy of a nation.The World Bank works out on all possible ways to develop the countries economic status on a futuristic view.
The World Bank provides money to fund projects of the developing country which would raise the economy. In times of crisis or natural calamity at once it lends a helping hand providing them assistance in medicine and other requirements.
Freedom of speech and just freedom in general
It adresses the problem where one side would control the other sides of the government and have too much power
