Answer:
Receiving $2,000 every year for 6 years is worth more today.
Explanation:
$2,000 received per year is annuity as same amount is received every year.
Given:
Amount received every year = $2,000
Time period = 6 years
Rate = 5%
Check PVIFA (Present value of annuity factor) table for 5% and 6 years, we get 5.0757
Present value of annuity = 2,000 × 5.0757
= $10,151.4
Receiving $2,000 every year for 6 years is worth more today than receiving $10,000 today as present value of annuity is worth $10,151.4 today which is more than $10,000.
So, $2,000 every year is worth more today.
The answer is D. Find the shirt and add it to the electronic shopping cart.
<span>Financial deregulation was a big part of why profits soared during these years. With businesses feeling as if they had more freedom to use their profits as they saw fit, they were able to increase technology, innovation, and therefore, their overall profit margins, instead of having to use those profits for tax purposes.</span>
Answer:
Answer in explanation.
Explanation:
I think that celebrities bother to involve themselves in politics to try and make a statement or gain more fame and followers. Oftentimes, you see celebrities speaking on world events such as the BLM act, global warming, wildfires, or the pandemic that is still ablaze. As we all know, all politicians have their strong opinions but the points do not always get across when just the politicians talk about it. Sometimes, celebrities feel the need to speak on a topic that may be popular in the world of politics just to shine a light on it or even to get more attention. In conclusion, I feel that celebrities try to worm their way into politics because I believe that they think that it will make an impact.
Answer:
The optimistic approach examines the best possible outcome in a given situation and chooses the 'best of the best' while the pessimistic approach examines the worst possible outcome in a given situation and chooses the 'best of the worst'.
Explanation:
Decision making under assumed uncertainty is an approach that is taken when the outcomes of future events are not entirely known. The Hurwicz criterion provides a basis on which the pessimistic and optimistic outcomes can be balanced. This criterion allows the person who makes the decision to chose a coefficient of pessimism signified by alpha (α) and it is a decimal that is graded between 0 and 1. This number signifies the worst possible outcome whereas, the number (1-α) signifies the best outcome.
So, the optimistic approach examines the best possible outcome in a given situation and allows the decision-maker to choose the 'best of the best', while the pessimistic approach examines the worst possible outcome in a given situation and the decision-maker to choose the 'best of the worst'