Question

The sheriff's department received an anonymous tip that a farmer was growing marijuana on his rural property. Investigators flew low over the farmer's property in a small plane belonging to the sheriff's department and took aerial photos of the property. Once developed, the photos indicated that the area in the center of the farmer's fields contained marijuana plants. That afternoon, four officers went to the perimeter of the farmer's property. Using wire cutters, they cut their way through the farmer's barbed wire fence and walked to the center of the field and found the marijuana plants. The officers then obtained a warrant to search the farmer's house. On arrival, they produced the search warrant and searched the farmer's house, finding large quantities of marijuana packaged and ready for sale. The marijuana was seized and the farmer was charged with numerous drug offenses. Prior to trial, the farmer's attorney moves to suppress evidence of the marijuana seized from the house.
Required:
Should the marijuana seized from the farmer's house be suppressed?

Answer 1

Marijuana seized from the farmer's home should not be suppressed because the warrant would be declared invalid by the court.
There is insufficient information to support the creditability and personal knowledge of the information.

What is warrant?

A warrant is a writ issued by a judge that authorizes law enforcement personnel to take certain actions, such as making an arrest, searching a location, or seizing property.

Hence marijuana should not seized from the farmer's house as explained that there is insffucient information

Learn more "warrant" here
brainly.com/question/21575414

#SPJ1