Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Both Nadia and Samantha have insured their cars and willing to pay $100 over the expected loss for insurance. If the car is stolen the company would pay expected loss and would earn nothing and if the car is not stolen the company would not be liable for any loss and would earn $200, Therefore the company would earn between $0 and $200.
It will cause the price of whatever said company is manufacturing to go up to cover the extra expense. This may also invoke a decline in sales due to higher prices.
<span>25 years: No Payment, but total is 250000
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1/2 year later is P(1+0.03)
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1 year later is P(1+0.03)^2
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1½ years later is P(1+0.03)^3
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 2 years later is P(1+0.03)^4
</span><span>We need to recognize these patterns. Similarly, we can identify the accumulated value of all 50 payments of "P". Starting from the last payment normally is most clear.
</span>
<span>P(1.03) + P(1.03)^2 + P(1.03)^3 + ... + P(1.03)^50
That needs to make sense. After that, it's an algebra problem.
P[(1.03) + (1.03)^2 + (1.03)^3 + ... + (1.03)^50]
</span>
P(<span><span>1.03−<span>1.03^51)/(</span></span><span>1−1.03) </span></span>= <span>250000</span>
