C - the Sheriff did not understand the true meaning of what Mrs. Hale
said. There were multiple ways to make what she was making and the men
walking in did not know the intricacies of the process and assumed it
was just what the word phonetically sounded like.
The argument does not show how peppermint oil should be used, which could lead to public rejection of this product.
We can come to this answer because:
- Coffee is a product well known by the public, who already know its effects and how to use it.
- To show a product that can completely replace the coffee of the article readers' lifetime, the author should present a product that is equivalent to coffee.
- Although the author presents peppermint oil as an alternative product to coffee, the author does not explain the usage formats and the effect of this oil.
- This promotes incorrect reasoning, as the reader will not be able to see the equivalence between the two products.
In this case, the author did not make a good comparison between the two products, as it reinforces the practicality of consuming coffee and makes peppermint oil inaccessible.
It should be remembered that the above question does not show all answer options and the options presented are incorrect.
More information:
brainly.com/question/4117438?referrer=searchResults
Explanation:
Globalization has impacted the social and economic environment by enabling greater interaction between people and different countries regardless of geographic distance, all made possible by new technologies, such as means of transport to the internet, which has revolutionized the way in which communication is carried out and business are made.
Therefore, an example impacted by globalization are the global value chains, which are the stages of the organizational production processes distributed in different locations, such as cell phone companies that have assembly plants in China due to the advantages related to labor and raw materials more cockroaches.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. i and ii.
Explanation:
You need to use past tense (found in i and ii) because the action took place in the past - we saw him doing something in the past (in this case, cycling). Therefore, this rules out iii. because it's a present moment.
However, if it's his routine (he cycles only in the rain), then iii. would also be correct - so it really depends on how you interpret the sentence (it is a bit ambiguous).
