1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cluponka [151]
2 years ago
13

According to the law of demand, as prices decrease, the quantity demanded.

Law
2 answers:
IgorC [24]2 years ago
7 0

According to the law of demand, as prices decrease, the quantity demanded increases.

<h3>What does the law of demand imply?</h3>

The law of demand implies that the quantity demanded of a good or service varies <u>inversely</u> with price.

Higher prices reduce the demand while lower prices increase the demand.

This law of demand holds until the equilibrium price is attained.

Thus, according to the law of demand, as prices decrease, the quantity demanded increases.

Learn more about the law of demand and supply at brainly.com/question/8886679

Elza [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The law of demand states that as the price of a good decrease, the quantity demanded of that good increases. In other words, the law of demand states that the demand curve, as a function of price and quantity, is always downward sloping.

Please give me brainliest -  you get 25% as well! I swear!

You might be interested in
Why is it that any law which contradicts natural law is unjust?
IceJOKER [234]
There is one called predicción
8 0
3 years ago
Did OJ Simpson commit the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman? Justify your answer by using compelling evidence from
dlinn [17]

Explanation:

The matching bloody gloves found at the murder scene and outside Simpson's home

9:36 P.M. Simpson, wearing a dark sweat suit, is seen by Kato Kaelin.

9:30-9:45 Charles Cale, walking his dog by Simpson's Rockingham residence, does not see Bronco.

10:02 Simpson attempts to call Paula Barbieri on the cell phone from his Bronco.

10:15 (prosecution)-10:40 (defense) Period during which murders took place.

10:22-10:30 Limo driver Allan Park, scheduled to take Simpson to airport, does not see Bronco on Rockingham.

10:40, 10:43, 10:49 Allan Park buzzes Simpson's intercom, but gets no response.

10:50 White or light bronco observed at the intersection of Bundy and Dorothy.

10:51 or 10:52 Kato Kaelin hears three thumps on the wall outside his room.

10:54 Allan Park sees a man wearing dark clothes, about 6-feet tall and 200 pounds, walk across the driveway of the Simpson residence.

10:55 Simpson lies to Allan Park.

1. The 9-1-1 call and the history of Simpson's violence directed at Nicole Brown.

2. Hair evidence: (1) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on cap at Bundy residence, (2) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on Ron Goldman's shirt.

3. Fiber evidence: (1) cotton fibers consistent with the carpet in the Bronco found on glove at Rockingham, (2) fibers consistent with the carpet from the Bronco found on cap at Bundy residence.

4. Blood evidence: (1) killer dropped blood near shoe prints at Bundy, (2) blood dropped at Bundy was of same type as Simpson's (about 0.5% of population would match), (3) Simpson had fresh cuts on left hand on day after murder, (4) blood found in Bronco, (5) blood found in foyer and master bedroom of Simpson home, (5) blood found on Simpson's driveway, (6) blood on socks in OJ's home matched Nicole's.

5. Glove evidence: (1) left glove found at Bundy and right glove found at Simpson residence are Aris Light gloves, size XL, (2) Nicole Brown bought pair of Aris Light XL gloves in 1990 at Bloomingdale's, (3) Simpson wore Aris Light gloves from 1990 to June, 1994.

6. Shoe evidence: (1) shoe prints found at Bundy were from a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, (2) bloody shoe impression on Bronco carpet is consistent with a Magli shoe, (3) Simpson wore a size 12 shoe.

7. Other evidence: (1) flight in Bronco, (2) strange reaction to phone call informing him of Nicole Brown's death, etc.

1. Simpson did not testify at his criminal trial. Defense attorneys will almost always call as a witness an articulate client that they believe to be innocent.

2. Subsequent to the trial defense attorneys talking about the trial have been careful to say "the jury did the right thing," while not stating that Simpson was in fact innocent.

3. Subsequent to the trial, Simpson has devoted no real effort to tracking down the "real killer," nor has any significant evidence surfaced suggesting that the killer was anyone other than Simpson.

4. The jury was not allowed to hear testimony concerning Simpson's rumored jailhouse confession to Rosie Grier.

5. Subsequent to the criminal trial other evidence of Simpson's guilt surfaced. The most significant of the new evidence may have been photographs of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes. The new evidence, together with much of the evidence considered in the criminal trial, convinced a civil jury that Simpson murdered Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman.

6. In his 2007 book, If I Did It, Simpson (for all intents and purposes) confessed. The book describes in detail events leading up to the moment of the murders

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is factual causation and legal causation mean the same thing? true or false
nikklg [1K]
The correct answer would be “False”
5 0
3 years ago
Jayne Adair, a California resident, fell from the third tier of seats at Wrigley Field while she was attending a Jimmy Buffett c
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

Jayne needs to make her lawsuit in the superior court because it has no jurisdiction boundaries.

Explanation:

Superior court is a court of general competence that has no jurisdiction.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a requirement for a personal services contract to be valid?
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

The correct option is A,it must be writing.

Explanation:

For a service to be valid it must be based on something lawful which is enforceable at law,otherwise the law court would declare as null and void,hence in that case performance of the other party cannot be enforced.

Consideration is also an important ingredient,which implies that something worthy or valuable must exchange hands between the parties to the contract as a compensation for performance of duties.

The parties must also be seen by law capable individuals nor minors who have no capability to enter into a valid contract.

All in all,option A is the odd one sticking out.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What type of government in created to perform a single job or specific task? Question 1 options: City Government Special Purpose
    13·1 answer
  • Significado de política. que es?
    14·2 answers
  • What happens if the defendant fails to report to court on the trial date?
    12·1 answer
  • Driving alone is a solo activity.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    6·2 answers
  • What do you determine to be successful policies currently in practice within the criminal justice system?
    6·1 answer
  • On what grounds can a lawyer find a juror to be partial
    10·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between the court of appeal and the supreme court UK
    8·1 answer
  • What is one of the main differences between a Roth IRA and a traditional IRA? A. They differ in the amount you can contribute at
    12·2 answers
  • what is the state of the black nationalist movement in relation to interest group formation and activities? Define &amp; discuss
    15·1 answer
  • 4. A branch manager of WR has received a request from a corporate customer, Acme Pty Ltd, which wishes to increase its overdraft
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!