Autocracy, political belief system, and mass development that overwhelmed numerous pieces of focal, southern, and eastern Europe somewhere in the range of 1919 and 1945 and that additionally had followers in western Europe, the United States, South Africa, Japan, Latin America, and the Middle East. Europe's first extremist pioneer, Benito Mussolini, took the name of his gathering from the Latin word fasces, which alluded to a heap of elm or birch poles (as a rule containing a hatchet) utilized as an image of a correctional expert in old Rome.
Answer:
They have kept the country intact
Explanation:
I think this is a very interesting question. In my opinion, I think they have kept the country intact, look at it this way. Political parties means that there exists choice for the people. Absence of political parties makes it a 1 man ruling without the necessary checks and balances. Like in that of a monarchical ruling t, or military ruling. Essentially, one can do and undo as one wishes.
Now, the advent of political parties brings choice, meaning the people can choose. In a situation where party A doesn't fulfill its political campaign promises, they are at risk of being voted out by the people for party B. Party B themselves won't sit down idle, while not in power, they wake the people up to the wrongdoings of party A.
Like I said, the presence of political parties brings choice to the people, and also creates checks and balances. So, yes, they have kept the country intact.
Answer:It's been overshadowed by other events, but King George III's decree—which banned colonial settlement west of the Appalachians—was the first in a series of British actions that led to the American Revolution.
Explanation:
Texas Secession Convention ceded from the nation with the argument that it was against the principles of the state to follow the Republican government thus formed.
Explanation:
Texas Secession Convention was one of the main moments of the history of the US that led to the Civil war happening as Texas was a newer state that succeeded rather dramatically with its own governor forced to give up his place as he did not agree to the plan.
It was because the election of the Republicans to senate and Congress made them angry and they knew that the anti slavery sentiment as well as the imposition of tarries on the state were to be levied, the people in the convention wanted out of the deal.
