The Black freedom struggle was one of the potent ways through which gay rights were fought for in the mid 20th century America.
One of the earliest know freedom struggles were the Dewey’s sit in after three teenagers were denied services at the restaurant because they were thought to be Gay.
<h3>
What was the Dewey's Sit-in?</h3>
The Dewey's sit-in was a series of protest carried out in the united states in 1965 to bring awareness to gay rights.
Adopting the lunch-counter sit-in strategy of the black civil rights movement, protesters held the nation's first successful LGBT sit-in in the spring of 1965 at Dewey's restaurant.
This restaurant was located at the Rittenhouse Square section of Philadelphia, Dewey's was a popular hangout after the bars closed.
Learn more about Gay rights at brainly.com/question/24078961
#SPJ1
Answer:
In Katz v. USA (1967), the most important Fourth Amendment case, the defendant was sentenced by a federal court for illegal gambling. He organized them using a long-distance telephone, which was the crime against federal law. The judge admitted evidence to the trial in the form of telephone recordings of the accused received by the FBI agents. They installed eavesdropping equipment outside the telephone booth with which the accused called while committing a crime. The Supreme Court rejected the conviction.
Despite the fact that in the Katz case, the Court emphasized the protection of a person’s private life, rather than premises, it made one reservation: “The Fourth Amendment should not be construed as a basis for the adoption of a common “right to privacy.”
The decision in the Katz case is of great importance also for another reason. Judge Harlan, who joined the majority opinion, defined the criteria subsequently used by the courts to establish a violation or non-violation of the Fourth Amendment as a result of specific actions by the authorities. This criterion is called “reasonable expectation of privacy.” The criterion is based on two premises: first, a person must show a valid (subjective) expectation of respect for the right to privacy; secondly, this expectation must be of such a kind that society can recognize it as "reasonable."
Explanation:
increasing prices and forming monopolies
