1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ede4ka [16]
1 year ago
9

Which of these is considered a power of governance? regulating trade

Social Studies
1 answer:
vesna_86 [32]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

Regulating trade between states maintaining armed forces, declaring war admitting new states.

You might be interested in
The defendant discovered that his friend had hit and killed a pedestrian while driving that afternoon, and that he had fled from
storchak [24]

Answer:

Not guilty, because he only helped his friend after the crime was already committed.

Explanation:

There are 3 main type of parties to a crime. they include;

<h3> 1. Principals  Parties</h3>

This is simply refred to as  those individual are those who along with required mental state, actually engage in the act or omission that causes the criminal result.

<h3>2. An accomplice </h3>

This is simply refered to as an individual who with the known intention that the crime be committed, aids, counsels, or encourages the principal before or during the process of the offense being carried out. Under modern statutes, accomplices are generally treated as principals.

<h3>3. An accessory after the fact</h3>

This is refered to as individuals  one who receives, relieves, comforts, or assists another knowing that he has committed a felony, in order to help the felon escape arrest, trial, or conviction.

When compared to an accomplice, an accessory after the fact has actually committed a separate crime with a punishment  and it is totally different and unrelated to the felony committed by the friend in this case. In the instant case, it is obvious that the defendant helped his friend in avoiding capture, that he provided no aid to the substantive offense, and that he did not intend the substantive offense to occur. Thus, he is an accessory after the fact and not an accomplice. Therefore, the defendant is not an accomplice, so due to the facts presented, it can therefore be said that he cannot be criminally liable for any other crimes committed by his friend.

4 0
2 years ago
What function of money is highlighted if someone puts cash under his or her mattress to have on hand for unexpected emergencies?
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

E. Store of value

Explanation:

A store of value is the function of an asset that can be saved, retrieved and exchanged at a later time, and be predictably useful when retrieved. More generally, a store of value is anything that retains purchasing power into the future, as seen for someone putting cash under the mattress.

5 0
3 years ago
Under​ negligence, a person is liable only for​ ________ events.
Lunna [17]
The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
8 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) and differential reinforcement of incomp
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer: In differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA), it is possible for the problem behavior and reinforced behaviour to coexist while in differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI), it is not.

Explanation:

Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) and differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI) are both ways to reduce or eliminate unsatisfactory behavior. They aim to change behavior by substituting unwanted behavior with target behavior and removing the reinforcement of unwanted behavior .

The difference between DRA and DRI is the compatibility of the behavior that is being reinforced with the existing behavior. While DRA shows an alternative way to behave, DRI only reinforces behavior incompatible with the problem behavior.  An example of DRA is is telling a student to raise her hand instead of shouting in class. Here, both of these behaviors are compatible. An example of DRI is telling a child who has a habit of talking while eating to do one or the other.

8 0
3 years ago
Please help, ASAP! <br><br> A.) position A<br> B.) position B<br> C.) position C<br> D.) position D
stiks02 [169]
C is the correct answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Starting in 1939, any nation fighting in World War II could purchase goods and arms in the United States under the _____________
    13·2 answers
  • The children in Tom Brown’s class enjoy playing word games such as Scrabble and like to revise their writing by adding more colo
    10·1 answer
  • The degree to which consumers feel a sense of belonging to the culture of their ethnic origins is known as _____.
    10·1 answer
  • For punishment to be most effective _____.
    6·1 answer
  • During lunch a group of computer science majors were discussing their choice of field. One student admitted that he had once con
    15·1 answer
  • who expressed the church's longstanding opinion that marriage is a sacrament that give grace to the couple on their journey towa
    10·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo lo podrías aplicar en tu vida personal? comunicación asertiva
    6·1 answer
  • 18. Paris tends to view personality as fairly stable and therefore her personality is more stable, whereas Lane
    6·1 answer
  • ¿Son el estrés y la ansiedad, reacciones humanas normales?
    13·1 answer
  • (Pls help!!!) match these
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!