The best way is: B. flat, so that the north pole of the magnets on the train point up and the north poles of the magnets on the track point down.
<h3>What is the law of magnetism?</h3>
The law of magnetism states that the like poles of a magnet repel one another while unlike (different) poles attract each other. Thus, two north (N) poles of a magnet would repel one another while a north (N) and south (S) would attract each other.
Based on the law of magnetism, the best way to arrange the magnets on the train and on the track, so as to allow the model train levitate is flat, as this would make the north (N) pole of the magnets on the train point up and the north (N) poles of the magnets on the track point down.
Read more on law of magnetism here: brainly.com/question/14945557
#SPJ1
<u>Complete Question:</u>
Jolie builds a model of a maglev train. She uses disc magnets to levitate the train. A disc magnet has its north and south poles on its faces, as shown.
What is the best way to arrange the magnets on the train and on the track so that the model train levitates?
Tax= sales price x tax percent
Tax= $40 x 6.5%
Convert % decimal to decimal: 6.5% by 100
Tax= 40 x 0.065
Tax= $2.60
Answer: sales tax is $2.60
Hope this helps!
Answer:
3.5 K
Explanation:
When a sample of a substance releases heat energy, its temperature decreases according to the equation:
where
Q is the heat energy released
m is the mass of the substance
C is the specific heat capacity
is the initial temperature
is the final temperature
For the block of brass in this problem, we have:
m = 0.1 kg is the mass
Q = -56.4 J is the heat energy released (negative since it is released)
C = 380 J/kg K is the specific heat capacity of brass
is the initial temperature
Solving for , we find the final temperature:
Hamilton thinks judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis because periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.
Alexander Hamilton was an American revolutionary. He was also a statesman and the Founding Father of the United States. He played a key role in promotion and interpretation of the constitution.
Permanent appointments would help to regulate more as well ensure greater independence of the judge.
Periodic appointment on the other hand would destroy a judge independence as he/she can be transferred or impeached anytime that fosters insecurity and lack of motivation to work.
Thus, permanent appointments is the only option.
To learn more about judges here
brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ4
Julia, Ernesto y Pablo are waiting for it (the bus).) is a correct statement.
<h3>What is the statement about?</h3>
The statement Julia, Ernesto y Pablo están esperándolo is a response to a previously given question which is Julia, Ernesto and Pablo are waiting for him in English.
Julia, Ernesto y Pablo are waiting for it the bus is also known to be the response to the first question and as such the tenses are correct.
Learn more about Spanish sentence from
brainly.com/question/7150507
#SPJ1
