Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.
In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.
The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.
Answer:
A and D
Explanation:
The deposition has two purposes: To find out what the witness knows and to preserve that witness' testimony. The intent is to allow the parties to learn all of the facts before the trial, so that no one is surprised once that witness is on the stand.
A deposition is essentially an interview where you answer questions from your lawyer as well as the opposing side's attorney. ... A deposition happens during the discovery phase of a lawsuit, not during the trial. It will not take place in a courtroom. Instead, it often takes place at one of the attorney's offices.
Answer:
Different Terminologies:
- Delegated Power
- Expressed Power
- Enumerated Power
This basically means that powers are specifically granted to the federal government; Examples such as: power to coin money, to regulate commerce, to declare war, to raise and maintain armed forces,
Answer: Gospel, any of four biblical narratives covering the life and death of Jesus Christ. Written, according to tradition, respectively by St. Matthew, St. Mark, St. Luke, and St. John. They approved the four Gospel accounts of Jesus Christ when they could have approved of any one Gospel is because these Gospels were the four biblical narratives that showed life or death for that of Jesus.
Hope this helped. Have a great day. Btw could you try to help me with my question it'd be a great help. ~ Komaljeet (:
The opposing lawyer would try to prove to a panel of 8 jurors that he did indeed steal the cards and use them. If at least 6 of the 8 jurors determine he did, then he would have to pay the cardholders back for the charges he put on the card. If 6 of the 8 jurors determine he didn't do it, then the case is dropped. If it's somewhere in the middle, then it's a hung jury and there would be a retrial. I recently sat on a jury for 3 weeks for a more complicated civil case.
