Answer:
The signs reference the role of the government in protecting the natural rights of the people.
Explanation:
Taking into consideration the signs that the protesters carry, their demands seem to be regarding the safety and security of the rights of not only the people but also that of the whole planet, including the planets and animals. The reference to "Life, Liberty, and Property" in their protest also suggest their intention of demanding for the protection of the whole planet including Mother Earth.
And so, with these signs, the protesters utilizes the Declaration of Independence in emphasizing their demands of the natural rights of the people. The demand that the people have the right to have a livable planet and be safe is an undeniable right. that With the Declaration a part of their reference, they are alluding to the role of the government in ensuring the protection of the people's natural rights.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
Answer:
B
Explanation: I don't know, I mean it seems sensible but i want to be a lawyer when i grow up and it looks like the disadvantage would be conflicts because say both owners decide on selling it, and owner A wants to sell it for lets say $450 and owner B wants to sell it for $750 that right there would be a conflict and could lead to in some cases a break of the contract they signed which can lead to court and all that stuff but the advantage would be that you could have many expert partners like the answer says and they could correct you on your mistakes, lets go back to the imaginary problem i made up. Owner A wants to sell the object for $450 dollars and owner B wants to sell it for $750 but Owner A is a more experienced and shows owner B that it was worth that but its been used so therefore you should lower the price and it would be easier to sell. (sorry if i sound stupid I wouldn't recommend using that as the answer but if you decide to please tell me if i'm right or wrong also I'm 12 so...)
Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding
Ask for suggestions, be kind, be sympathetic to better understand the issue
When they see your struggling
