Answer:
Stained relationship with love ones.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's *<u>final walk-through</u>*, and *<u>logs the evidence</u>*.
Explanation:
It's been a few years since I've taken the class, but I finished the class with my grade over 99% so I'm probably remembering this correctly.
EDIT: Emergency correction, Final Walk-Through is correct, Logs the Evidence is NOT. This narrows the second blank down to only two options, I'll leave it to whoever reads this to use common sense and guess between the two.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that a federal tribunal can hear or solve a particular conflict by referring to the concept of justiciability. Justiciability is a term in law that refers to the limits upon legal issues over which a court can exercise its judicial authority. In other words, justiciability establishes the situations when a particular court can exercise its duties. When a court cannot provide an adequate solution to a dispute, the matter is considered not justiciable.
As she is not fully qualified to do that as it hasn't been property diagnosed and recorded
Answer:
False
Explanation:
This is not true of experiential reality. Therefore it is false. Experiential reality is different from what is described in this question. Instead what is described is Agreement reality.
In experiential reality, we have to experience reality or something first before we can establish it as real or true. What we experience could be physical, but through direct experience we are able to know if it is true.
