Listen carefully to them and ask for help if you need to.
The losses in the Middle East were staggering: the war not only ravaged the land and decimated armies, it destroyed whole societies and economies. In this way, the experience of World War I in the Middle East is perhaps more akin to the experience of World War II in Europe.
<span>Based on what I know about the Cold War and the quote you gave above I would choose this option: It showed that democratic nations were facing a threat from Soviet expansionism.
Churchill had no plans to attack the Soviets or liberate these states. It was merely about pointing out the spreading of communism and that the western nations should join forces to contain it.</span>
The answer is b<span>y ruling gently with religious tolerance new areas were easier to conquer with least resistance. </span>
In the United States, it was the "War Hawks" who <span>supported declaring war against England in 1812, since they believed that such a war would enhance the standing of the US internationally. </span>
