1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
2 years ago
12

Can someone please write me a 3 paragraph judicial opinion on any chosen case??

History
1 answer:
Liula [17]2 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.

Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.

The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.

You might be interested in
Sedimentary Rock Created from the _____ and solidification of _____ or _____.
Mashutka [201]
I think its:
-Pressure
-Sand
-Gravel
(not sure on the gravel bit)

5 0
3 years ago
Which statements describe Sargon's achievements as an empire builder?
Simora [160]

Answer: A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Why does the federal government make grants in aid to the states
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
<span>The federal government has used state and local government as agents to administer this aid and as such has the ability to keep the states concerned in check. In theory this gives the federal government a great deal of power over the states receiving aid. BAM!!!! I answered your question.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving?
satela [25.4K]
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving:  protection of individual rights.

Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."

Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have.  New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written.  For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy.  <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage.  Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake.  The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States [and] relinquishes all claims to the Government, Propriety, and Territ
uranmaximum [27]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The Founding Fathers that were involved in the creation of this document in 1783 was John Adams, with the help of Benjamin Franklin, and John Jay.

We are talking about the Treaty of Paris, the treaty the United States and Great Britain signed in Paris, France, on September 3, 1783. This definitive treaty formally ended the Revolutionary War of Independence and England finally gave the United States its independence.

This was an important and crucial moment in the history of the new nation. After so much struggle, suffering, pain, and death, the 13 American colonies had accomplished its goal of independence.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • n the 1824 presidential election, Andrew Jackson came in first in the popular vote but second in the electoral vote. came in fir
    13·2 answers
  • The labels can be used more than once. Match the invaders with the nations they captured.
    6·2 answers
  • Read this excerpt from The Iliad .
    5·2 answers
  • What events led to the frontier wars?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Columbus write "having trouble with the crew"?
    6·1 answer
  • How were the Mycenaeans and the Minoans similar?
    11·1 answer
  • In paragraph 5, Dr. King repeats the words "There comes a time" several times. What is the effect of this use of repetition?
    15·2 answers
  • Which phrase appears in the preamble of Florida’s constitution and in the preamble of the US Constitution?
    10·1 answer
  • The United States of America was originally founded by white men and their families who traveled to a new land to escape religio
    15·1 answer
  • Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states' ability to:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!