Answer:
This is TRUE.
Explanation:
Let's take a look at the passage where Hinman speaks of the villagers from Le Chambon:
<em>When we look at the villagers of Le Chambon, </em><u><em>we are not only struck by what they did but also by who they were. We are struck by what good people they were. Their goodness did not seem to stem from any Kantian test of universality or utilitarian calculus of consequences. It came from the heart— from who they were as persons.</em></u>
The villagers he is speaking of were responsible for saving the lives of thousands of Jews when Nazism was terrorizing Europe. When the Nazi soldiers got hold of one man, the villagers surrounded the bus where he was sitting and gave him precious, rationed food. When he returned and tried to give them their gifts back, they wouldn't accept it. <u>Their actions, according to Hinman, had no purpose or gain for themselves. They did what they did simply because they were good people, because they had goodness in their hearts.</u>
Answer:
In the next 72 hours, forecasters expect the mass of cold air to weaken, bringing warmer and less rainy days, but they expect the cold to persist at least until Thursday morning.
Explanation:
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's "favorite".
Explanation:
Adjectives are something you can take out of the sentence and it'd still make sense. Plus, it's also describing his comic.
Answer:
... John and Mary are equal.
Explanation:
We can use basic logic reasoning to complete this sentence. We have two premises that, being true, lead to a conclusion.
Premise 1: All citizens are equal.
Premise 2: John and Mary are citizens.
In that case, John and Mary are equal. They are citizens, and all citizens are equal. At no point, we are told John and Mary are an exception to this fact. So, John and Mary's being equal is the only logical conclusion from the two premises we have.
I would say its a late 20th century style of art, and architecture
