1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tanya [424]
2 years ago
6

PLEASE BRO HELP.pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls (pls) p.s please

English
1 answer:
goblinko [34]2 years ago
5 0
Ethos is using credibility to persuade someone like using a celebrity or scientist.
Pathos is using material that produces strong emotions one way or the other
Logos is using statistics and facts to persuade one way or the other.

Propaganda uses at least one or all three of these. It is material used to promote a political side, event, or point of view.
You might be interested in
What role should the government and the American people play in preserving the various forms of life on earth?
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

There is an ongoing debate about the appropriate role of government for solving environmental problems, with many environmentalists calling for increased government intervention and many people more predisposed to individual responsibility calling for less.

Without getting into a long discussion on political and economic philosophy (for now), here are a few observations on this important topic:

Proponents of classic liberalism — property rights, free markets, the rule of law, individual freedom — assume that as information improves, private markets will lead to the increased preservation of environmental resources, and that externalities (e.g., pollution) will be internalized (e.g., taken into account by private actors) given a system of strong property rights. While much improvement in the environmental arena has occurred for this very reason, and much of this is due to property rights and better scientific knowledge, many famous economists vastly under-estimated the level of coordination required to tackle some of the world’s most serious environmental problems. Issues such as global warming and the loss of biodiversity require much more government intervention then had previously been assumed. This is not to say that this government intervention won’t rely heavily on the workings of the market system, but only that top-down regulation is absolutely necessary. There is simply no way to adequately address these issues without a strong commitment from the federal government, which will eventually include a high level of international cooperation. Policies such as absolute limits on CO2, government funding of alternative-energy systems, and coordinated efforts to purchase and protect biodiversity hotspots around the world will need to be a major component of future government policy.

Facing increased probabilities of natural disasters (many presumably due to global warming), the government should move us towards a more rational method of risk management in areas prone to natural disasters. It is highly inefficient, as well as an abrogation of government responsibility, to create incentives for people to live in areas that are both dangerous and prone to catastrophe by providing them with reconstruction aid every time disaster strikes. The government has two options; either require that all people living in hurricane zones, flood plains, or near fault lines purchase private insurance, or make it absolutely clear that people will not be compensated for their loss of property by the government if disaster strikes. Such a policy would no doubt lead to dramatic shifts in the population densities in many disaster-prone areas of the country, and perhaps some one-time assistance for relocation would be required. The net effect would be to dramatically reduce future losses of life and property and save the government hundreds of billions in future costs. It would also force private actors (notably insurance companies) to fully take into account the effects of environmental externalities that until now have largely been ignored.

Regarding personal health and risk, the government must play a much more active role than typically advocated by some of the strongest proponents of free markets. Milton Friedman famously noted that there is no use for the Food and Drug Administration since companies whose products lead to illness will be forced out of the market (i.e., products that make people sick will not be bought). What he failed to realize is that if someone gets sick, it is extremely difficult to trace the source of the illness, and without government regulation many companies that poison consumers could in fact operate profitably for long periods of time. But Friedman did have a point in that as people look more and more toward government to regulate the economy, they sometimes do decrease the effort they invest in making wise choices for themselves (e.g., does anyone really need the government to tell them that “fast food” is bad for you?). This being said, it is clear that in this highly complex and inter-connected system, where we all are exposed to thousands of chemicals a year, many of which interact in ways that aren’t yet fully understood, where it is hard to trace the origin of products, and where the effects of these products often don’t manifest for years, the government must play an active role in regulation. The information problems are too complex for individuals to cope with (and, unfortunately, governments, at this point). The Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture should all be well-funded, be decoupled from conflicts of interest with industry, and their mandate to protect the public welfare through rational risk assessment should be strengthened.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Ways by which parents can improve equal power relations in a family set up
pantera1 [17]

Parents should sit and discuss things with their children.  They must remind them that they have to help each other and watch out for each other. More importantly, they should emphasize the fact that everyone is treated as equals.  No one is above the other. It will prevent conflict and rivalry among children.

3 0
3 years ago
What do you do ""spring and all"" convey about nature? Discuss how this theme relates to the conventions of pastoral poetry.
Alona [7]

Answer:

"Spring and all" relates to the conventions of pastoral poetry because:

The poem describes nature in a certain scenario but it complements it by idealizing it with a value judgment.

Explanation:

The two reasons that back the answer are that in the first place description is good and objective. However, when it is complemented with believes, and opinions, they gain a grade of value judgment. In our case the association between pastoral poetry and the poem of William is that he idealizes certain aspects of the scenario he describes like:

But now the stark dignity of

entrance—Still, the profound change

has come upon them: rooted, they

grip down and begin to awaken

Providing dignity to a natural characteristic that is improper of it. Showing his idealizations.

5 0
3 years ago
Plz help i dot get it
butalik [34]
In order of this:
Climax
Falling Action
Exposition
Resolution
Rising Action
4 0
3 years ago
Click on all the words that make up the prepositional phrase in the sentence
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

Low and gravelly voice

Explanation:

Because singers can sing in both the types of voices

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following words is an example of onomatopoeia?
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST states the theme of this poem? A) Anyone can fall in love. B) Love is risky and should be avoided. C) Love
    10·2 answers
  • Do you think this article comes from a reliable news source? Did you find information from a well-known organization, such as th
    6·1 answer
  • Correct the following sentences:
    14·1 answer
  • Read the poem.
    5·2 answers
  • Write a paragraph about yourself using the present tense
    10·1 answer
  • Only the federal and state governments can tax your income.<br> True Or False
    12·1 answer
  • What is true about 5x10
    7·2 answers
  • Identify the choice that best answers the question
    12·1 answer
  • Talking about movie or series that you liked and why?​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!