1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zigmanuir [339]
2 years ago
6

What is the legal process of a property or properties in an unincorporated area or county becoming part of a neighboring city

Law
1 answer:
Goryan [66]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The two most prevalent types of city boundary changes are incorporation, which is the creation of a city government in unincorporated territory of a county, and annexation, which is the addition of unincorporated territory to an existing city.

You might be interested in
The two forms of ethical reasoning almost never reach the same conclusions. True or False?
Aneli [31]
False is the answer
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you're under 21
denis-greek [22]
It is A because over the age of 18 is still an adult
4 0
3 years ago
Explain the reason for a closer relationship between the prime minister and the legislature in a parliamentary democracy.
Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

The political party or coalition of parties that make up a majority of the parliament’s membership select the prime minister and department ministers. The prime minister usually is the leader of the majority party, if there is one, or the leader of one of the parties in the ruling coalition. Some ceremonial executive duties are carried out by a symbolic head of state — a hereditary king or queen in a democratic constitutional monarchy, such as Great Britain, Japan, Norway, or Spain, or an elected president or chancellor in a democratic constitutional republic such as Germany, Italy, or Latvia. The judicial function typically is independent of the legislative and executive components of the system.

In a parliamentary system, laws are made by majority vote of the legislature and signed by the head of state, who does not have an effective veto power. In most parliamentary democracies, the head of state can return a bill to the legislative body to signify disagreement with it. But the parliament can override this ‘‘veto’’ with a simple majority vote.

In most parliamentary systems, there is a special constitutional court that can declare a law unconstitutional if it violates provisions of the supreme law of the land, the constitution. In a few parliamentary systems, such as Great Britain, New Zealand, and the Netherlands, there is no provision for constitutional or judicial review, and the people collectively possess the only check on the otherwise supreme legislature, which is to vote members of the majority party or parties out of office at the next election.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Hi PLEASE HELP ASAP.!! so back in pro-life month, my teacher and I had a little argument over something literally so silly. It w
lapo4ka [179]

There are several reasons why Ted Bundy deserved the death penalty. He killed a lot of people

<h3>Reasons why the death penalty was an adequate punishment for Ted Bundy:</h3>
  • He killed a lot of people in the society.
  • He was a predator.
  • He raped people.
  • He was a kidnapper
  • He had no mercy for the people he attacked.
  • He was jailed, he escaped from Jail and still killed again.
  • If granted parole in years later, someone like him would still atatck innocents again.
  • It was the good that the society got rid of him. People like him would always be a danger to other good people.
  • The people that he killed did not deserve to die also. He was only made to tast his own medicine.

Read more on the death penalty here: brainly.com/question/509558

3 0
2 years ago
Research a supreme court decision. Tell me the for and against arguments in the court. And what it was about.
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

(Hint: Random drug tests of students involved in extracurricular activities do not violate the Fourth Amendment.)

In Veronia School District v. Acton (1995), the Supreme Court held that random drug tests of student athletes do not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. Some schools then began to require drug tests of all students in extracurricular activities. The Supreme Court in Earls upheld this practice.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Dr. Umberger do to prove Dr. Coppolino’s guilt?
    5·1 answer
  • Which step in the progression of a criminal case requires the government to
    7·2 answers
  • What is declares war branch of government leslislative,executive or judicial
    11·2 answers
  • How were the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fifteenth Amendment
    9·1 answer
  • Grounds on which the registrar of a partnership business may lawfully refuse to register a partnership
    15·1 answer
  • What is the difference between continuous crime and transitory crime​
    11·2 answers
  • What are the names of the 7major UK parties who were campaigning to win the election
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the difference between science and philosophy?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the last step in the criminal law process for a defendant?
    6·1 answer
  • What are your thoughts regarding the future of justice in the United States?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!