La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente. Aunque no existen opciones de respuestas, comentaremos lo siguiente.
Describe cómo se da la violencia escolar dirigida:
1.- Por los alumnos contra sus pares: siendo groseros con ellos. Faltándoles el respeto con caras y modos, contestaciones absurdas y actitudes que muestran su mala gana.
Por un docente contra los alumnos: faltando el respeto a los alumnos con posturas despectivas o comentarios lastimosos. Con actitudes indiferentes y respuestas groseras o cortantes.
Los alumnos contra los docentes: mostrando su indiferencia en clase, ausentándose de clase sin ningún motivo en particular, interrumpiendo las clases de manera intempestiva, contestando de manera agresiva a las preguntas del maestro.
En la escuela debe existir un muto respeto entre maestros, alumnos, autoridades, y padres de familia. Si se rompe este equilibrio, algunas de las partes se verá más afectada que la otra, causando un daño considerable en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje.
N an organizational structure, “chain of command” refers to a company's hierarchy of reporting relationships – from the bottom to the top of an organization, who must answer to whom. The chain of command not only establishes accountability, it lays out a company's lines of authority and decision-making power.
Answer:
It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.
Explanation:
For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.
Answer:
<h3>True.</h3>
Explanation:
No doubt individuals who post content on social media cannot just 'blow off some steam' unless it is thoroughly researched or proven otherwise. In most cases, individuals who post contents online are held legally responsible if their contents or statements are misleading or defamatory.
However, they are not held legally responsible for any forms of criminal activity as publishing wrong contents or making defamatory statements usually fall under the purview of 'tort' or civil cases. The parties are also liable to be sued for libel or defamation in civil courts.
Answer:
a run down neighbourhood
Explanation:
this theory is based on disordered areas, which will be more likely to have higher crime rates than affluent neighbourhoods.
