1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
2 years ago
7

Which characteristics of Nazi Germany's government were those of a totalitarian state?

History
2 answers:
Sav [38]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Friedrich and Brzezinski wrote that a totalitarian system has the following four mutually supportive and defining characteristics:

Elaborate guiding ideology.

Single mass party, typically led by a dictator.

System of terror, using such instruments as violence and secret police.

Monopoly on weapons.

Digiron [165]2 years ago
4 0

In all honesty, Nazi philosophy was totalitarian, but it was imposed over a population that was generally free, hence Nazi Germany was not nearly as "totalitarian" as Soviet Russia. Many anti-Nazis were just disregarded, Konrad Adnaur being one such example. Nazi methods, aside from their treatment of Jews, were not particularly dictatorial until World War II, when they spread to all of the participating nations. However, a number of "preexisting" customs allowed for totalitarianism. One was the need that everyone have an identity card that showed their ethnicity. The previous corporate system, which included several oligopolies, industry organizations, and a heavily regulated retail sector, was the second factor. Another tool was the widespread custom in Europe that calls for new residents to register with the local police. Many ‘totalitarian’ practices had been in place Napoleonic times.  A totalitarian state is one that aims to have complete control over every aspect of its citizens' lives. Nazi Germany was undoubtedly like that. As part of the Lebensborn initiative, infants were manufactured. The state took control of all trade unions, sporting organizations, and cultural associations. It even went so far as to take control of local choirs and subordinate them to the national socialist choir organization and local knitting societies, which it subordinated to the national socialist handicraft association. It gave boys early Nazi education in the Hitlerjugend, similar to what girls received in BDM. Holidays were provided by the state via the Kraft durch Freude program, and national socialist indoctrination permeated every aspect of this. It was virtually difficult to engage with others in any official capacity in late 1930s Germany without the Nazi party being involved. When people made informal connections, the gestapo were instantly suspicious and arrested those involved. Even if a group of young people gathered together to listen to music recordings and dance a little, the gestapo would round them up, detain them, and question them to learn why they were hanging out with people who weren't affiliated with official Nazi groups. Although it seems absurd, it actually did take place in that manner. It was awful. True to the definition of the word, the Nazi state was a totalitarian one. It want complete dominance over everyone's life.

You might be interested in
why are individual rights important to a democratic society in wartime? Why are there some limits on these rights?
ExtremeBDS [4]
There have always been conflicts between individual rights and national security interests in democracies. Limits on civil liberties during wartime, including restrictions on free speech, public assembly, and mass detentions, have been the most serious threats to individual freedom. Even in peacetime, counter-terrorist measures including profiling, detention, and exclusion, along with the use of national identification cards, have raised concerns about racism, constitutional violations, and the loss of privacy. With the passage of new anti-terrorist laws after September 11, 2001, these tensions have increased. Supporters of broader governmental powers insist that they are part of the increased security measures necessary to safeguard national security. In contrast, many civil rights groups fear that the infringement upon individual rights is another step in the erosion of democratic civil society.

Wartime measures. The severest restrictions on civil liberties have occurred in times of war. In September 1862, during the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865) suspended the right of habeas corpus in order to allow federal authorities to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without arrest warrants or speedy trials. Well aware of the drastic nature of such a step, Lincoln justified it as a necessary wartime measure. After the United States Supreme Court found Lincoln's abrogation of habeas corpus an unconstitutional intrusion on Congressional authority, Congress itself ratified the measure by passing the Habeas Corpus Act in September 1863. Through 1864, about 14,000 people were arrested under the act; about one in seven were detained at length in federal prisons, most on allegations of offering aid to the Confederacy but others on corruption and fraud charges.



Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/In-Int/Intelligence-and-Democracy-Issues-and-Conflicts.html#ixzz4XX37pHRv
4 0
3 years ago
Which countries did Italy make an alliance with, but never joined? But instead, joined the opposing alliance?
lbvjy [14]

Answer:

When World War I broke out in the summer of 1914, Italy declared itself neutral in the conflict, despite its membership in the so-called Triple Alliance alongside Germany and Austria-Hungary since 1882.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which groups worked as artisans in emerging social hierarchies in early river civilizations
Natalka [10]
Weavers and metalworkers! :)
7 0
3 years ago
What factors led to the convention replacing the caucus as a widely used nominating method?
ivanzaharov [21]
Different groups within political parties may have different goals isn the presidential nominating process. but of course, all parties are surely interested in winning the election, but depending on one whether one is a leader, or maybe even an activist,this goal may conflict with other purposes of the political parties.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the whigs view irish immigrants?
ale4655 [162]

Catholics overwhelmingly voted Democrat, while Protestants were split between the two parties. Recent Irish and German immigrants generally supported the Democrats, but recent immigrants from England, Scotland, and Wales tended to support the Whigs.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the Muslim ruler Osman known for?
    5·2 answers
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST ONCE I FINISH THE QUIZ!
    12·1 answer
  • How did early Arabs organize their lives?
    9·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • >
    6·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe how to determine the y-intercept and the slope from the graph below? On a coordinate plane,
    15·2 answers
  • Bata 1: FyoW PoUwhsz!
    10·2 answers
  • An annual fur rendezvous can best be described as a
    15·1 answer
  • Based on his New Deal plan, which of the following statements would Roosevelt MOST likely to agree with?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the atmosphere in which the baby boomers grew up contribute to the counterculture?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!