1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
2 years ago
9

What are the pros and cons of disregarding precedents?

History
1 answer:
Elanso [62]2 years ago
4 0
<h2><em>What is precedent?</em></h2>

In the world of politics and law, precedent refers to a legal principle established in a prior court ruling that should be adhered to in subsequent rulings in accordance with <em>stare decisis (Latin for "to stand by things decided")</em>, a legal doctrine for adhering to precedent.

<h2><em>Pro</em></h2>
  • Disregarding precedent is one way the U.S. justice system adapts and remains current with an ever-changing society and culture.

Times change, but precedent does not. For instance, a ruling made in 1896 may have set a precedent perceived as outdated several decades later. Such was the case with the landmark Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), affirming and precedenting racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine; however, the precedent Plessy v. Ferguson set would later be overturned in another landmark case, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), under the review of a more modern Supreme Court, influenced by a changing society.

<h2><em>Con</em></h2>
  • Disregarding precedent creates room for unpredictability within the justice system and undermines the authority vested in precedent.

When it comes to the law, predictability is important in the maintenance of an orderly society so that members of society can function with an awareness of what they can and cannot do to avoid unsavory consequences. When precedent is disregarded, the law is changed, and the justice system becomes less predictable. Additionally, when precedent is overturned, <em>stare decisis</em> is violated, and the authority of the precedent itself, along with those who set it, is undermined.

You might be interested in
What is the significance of the English Bill of Rights on the development of the U.S Constitution?
guapka [62]

Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.

6 0
4 years ago
What shoe brand was inspired by a skiing accident?
Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

Dr.Martens

Explanation:

A German army doctor named Dr. Klaus Martens found himself with an injury after skiing in 1945. His standard issue army boots were uncomfortable, so he made some design improvements while he was recovering.

6 0
3 years ago
Who was the 42nd president of the u.s?
defon
Bill Clinton is the 42nd president


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about Franklin Roosevelt's presidency is not true?
mixas84 [53]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C. He appointed many blacks to government positions and chose a woman as his secretary of labor." The statement about Franklin Roosevelt's presidency is not true is that <span>He appointed many blacks to government positions and chose a woman as his secretary of labor.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Were Mesopotamian gods seen as positive or negative and why?
masha68 [24]

The cultures of Mesopotamia had a polytheistic belief system, which means that the people believed in multiple gods instead of just one. They also believed in demons created by the gods, which could be good or evil. Mesopotamian gods were seen as benevolent, ordered, and nuturing by early Mesopotamians. They thought that the gods influenced much of what happened to them in their lives.  The people of Mesopotamia worshiped these other worldly beings to keep the beings happy, because if one of these powerful beings was angered then the people of Mesopotamia would, in some way, be punished for that unhappiness. They believed that when something bad happened, whether a natural disaster or not, it was because the correlating god was angry at them, so they did their best to keep the gods happy.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which statement best describes a differences between the political system in ancient greece and ancient Rome
    5·1 answer
  • Were Native Americans in California better off before or after Mexico secularized the missions?
    6·2 answers
  • The magna Carta and the English bill of rights share which of these important characteristics?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain the event (s) that were occurring that led to the Crusades.​
    6·1 answer
  • Identify supporting details. List three details from the platform that support the populist party's position
    13·1 answer
  • What do the historical thinking skills do ?
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the concerns of radical evangelists, such as the tennents, and the impact they had on pennsylvania's colonial elite.
    5·1 answer
  • Choose all that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • Please help i’ll give brainly
    10·1 answer
  • 2. The Olympics were dedicated to Ares, the god of war.<br> A. TRUE<br> B. FALSE
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!