In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
They both extended slavery. They both freed enslaved people. They both united the thirteen states. They both encouraged settlement. They both ordinances set aside plots of land for educational purposes. Hope this helps!!!
Answer:
Constitution is the answer
Answer:
here is your answer
hope this answers may help you
If you find it appropriate then mark it as brainlist plzzzzzzzzz
Native American tribes are grouped by the language they speak. For example, the Apaches are a group of several tribes that all speak the same language.
