Answer:
D. Tasha: "If coffee drinkers expect the price of coffee to rise next month, then current demand will go up and lead to a price increase this month."
This is the only one with incorrect economic analysis
Explanation:
A. is correct because a shortage of supply would drop the price as we can see in the Graph 1 with the supply curve.
B. is correct because if the two goods are substitues then a lower price for caffeinated soft drinks like Mountain Dew would cause the consumer demand for coffe to go down because the consumers would prefer the good with lower price, rising the demand for Mountain dow in detriment of coffe.
C. is correct as we can see in the Graph 1, the increse in the demand would generate a higher price but it would make the demand go back to D1
D. is incorrect because if coffee drinkers consume more coffee this monht the price would lower.
Answer:
The correct option is Dana might be indifferent between C, A, and B.
Explanation:
Note: See the attached photo for the indifference curve showing points A, B and C.
The answer can be explained using an indifference curve.
An indifference curve is a graph that depicts the combination of two commodities that provide equal satisfaction or utility to the consumer. A consumer is indifferent between the two commodities at each point on an indifference curve because all points on the curve provide him with the same level of satisfaction or utility.
In the attached photo, bundles A, B and C are plotted as points on the same indifference curve (IC). Since points A, B and C are on the same IC, it therefore implies that Dana might be indifferent between C, A, and B.
Therefore, the correct option is Dana might be indifferent between C, A, and B.
The other day, someone asked me about the last time my ethics had been tested at work and how I reacted.
I wasn’t sure how to respond. It’s a good question, and I wanted to answer it. Still, I hesitated to reveal too much about some of the less-than-honest bosses I’ve reported to in the last two decades.
These are bosses who lied, gossiped about their staff to other staff, broke confidences, fudged numbers to governmental agencies, botched payroll tax withholdings and covered it up, and willfully and recklessly turned a blind eye to leadership abuse — for starters.
Answer:
$1,241
Explanation:
For computing the net advantage to leasing first we have to determine the total cash flow from leasing and total cash flow from buying which is shown below:
For leasing:
Year Lease payment PVF at 5.8% Present value
1 $6,500 0.9452 $6,144
2 $6,500 0.8934 $5,807
3 $6,500 0.8444 $5,489
Total outflow $17,440
For buy:
Year Outflow or inflow PVF at 5.8% Present value
0 ($23,000) 1 ($23,000)
1 $1,610 0.9452 $1,522
2 $1,610 0.8934 $1,438
3 $1,610 0.8444 $1,359
Total outflow $18,681
Now the net advantage to leasing is
= Buy outflow - leasing outflow
= $18,681 - $17,440
= $1,241
