Answer: Paul has a taxable dividend of $15,000.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that ABC Corporation has E & P of $240,000 and distributes land with a fair market value of $70,000 (adjusted basis of $25,000) to its sole shareholder, Paul. We are further informed that the land is subject to a liability of $55,000.
The taxable dividend will be the difference between the fair market value of land and the liability on the land. This will be:
= $70,000 - $55,000
= $15,000
Therefore, Paul has a taxable dividend of $15,000.
Answer: C. high returns
Explanation: Risk-return tradeoff is an investing theory which indicates that as higher the risk, the greater the return reward. In order to determine an acceptable risk-return tradeoff, investors need to weigh several aspects, including total risk exposure, the ability to substitute missing capital, and more.
the answer i prefer is either A OR E ...cause without identifying the costs of a business u can't really run a bs successfully
Answer: The answer is as follows:
Explanation:
Given that,
Used car $93.38 per month for 60 months
Cash price = $4,200
Down payment = $50
(a) Amount Financed = Total Value (Cash Price) - Down Payment
= 4200 - 50
= $4150
(b) Finance Charge = Total payments - Amount Financed
= 93.38 × 60 - 4150
= 5602.8 - 4150
= $1452.8
(c) Deferred payment price = Down Payment + Total payments
= 50 + 5602.8
= $5652.8
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
