1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masha68 [24]
1 year ago
12

According to the 2010 Census, 13% of all housing units in the United States were vacant. A Vigo County supervisor wonders if her

county is different from this. She randomly selects 550 housing units in her county and finds that 130 of the housing units are vacant. Conduct an appropriate hypothesis test for the supervisor and state your conclusion.
Mathematics
1 answer:
AysviL [449]1 year ago
3 0

The conclusion is that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the percentage of vacant housing units in their district differs from the percentage of vacant housing units in the country.

Given that the total number of a housing units in her country is 550 and the number of vacant housing units in her country is 130.

The Null hypothesis is p₀=13%=0.13, n=550 and x=130

Significance level α=0.05

Claims given: percentage other than 13%

The claim is anyone of the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis shows that the proportion of the population is equal to the value stated in the claim. If the null hypothesis is a claim, then the alternative hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.

H₀:p=13%=0.13

Hₐ:p/0.13

I'm interested in testing population proportion claims, so I'll use z-text with proportions.

Conditions: Random sample, 10% condition, pass / fail condition

Sample: I'm happy because the housing units were randomly selected.  10% Condition: We are happy because the sample of 550 homes in your county is less than 10% of the population.

Pass/ fail condition: Satisfied because both np₀ and n(1-p₀) are both at least 10.

np₀=550(0.13)=71.5≥10

n(1-p₀)=550(1-0.13)=478.5≥10

Therefore, we conclude that all the conditions are met.

The sample percentage is the number of successes divided by the sample size.

\begin{aligned}\hat{p}&=\frac{x}{n}\\ &=\frac{130}{550}\\ &\approx 0.2364\end

Determines the value of the test statistic:

\begin{aligned}z&=\frac{\hat{p}-p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}} \\ &=\frac{0.2364-0.13}{\sqrt{\frac{0.13(1-0.13)}{550}}}\\ &=\frac{0.1064}{0.0143}\\&\approx 7.41 \end

The P-value is the probability of getting a test statistic value  or a  more extreme value if the null hypothesis is true. Use the normal probability table in the appendix to determine the P-value.

P=P(Z<−7.41 or Z>7.41)

P=2P(Z>7.41)

P=2(0)

P=0

If the P-value is less than the significance level α,  the null hypothesis is rejected.

P<0.05⇒ Reject H₀

Therefore, there is ample evidence to support the claim that the proportion of vacant homes in the area is different from the proportion of vacant homes in the country.

Learn more about Standard normal distribution from here brainly.com/question/13383035

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
2. Which is equivalent to the calculator output 8.954 E - 15?
anyanavicka [17]

Answer: 8.954 x 10^-15

Step-by-step explanation:

i took a test with this question and this was the answer

8 0
2 years ago
5x+7/2=3/2x-14 solve this
Alchen [17]
X=-2

You can also check by plugging -2 in for x. Here is a picture. Please notify me if I made an error!

3 0
3 years ago
Is the ordered pair (-2, 1) a solution to the equation - 3x + y = 5? <br>No <br>Yes​
Otrada [13]

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

Plug (-2,1) into -3x+y=5. This will make it -3(-2)+(1)=5. This is equal to 6+1=5. 7=5. 7 is not equal to 5. Therefore, (-2,1) is not a solution to the equation -3x+y=5.

If this helps please mark as brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
Add: (112 + 2) + (92 - 4)
pantera1 [17]

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

(112+2)+(92-4)

114+88

202

-hope it helps

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A sales manager collected data on annual sales for new customer accounts and the number of years of experience for a sample of 1
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Years of experience (X) :

1

3

3

5

7

8

10

10

12

12

Annual sales (Y) :

85

97

95

97

105

106

122

120

113

134

The estimated regression equation obtained is :

y = b0 + b1x

b0 = 82.82967

b1 = 3.46061

ŷ = 3.46061X + 82.82967

The change in annual sales for every year of experience is given by the slope value, b1 = 3.46061 = 3.5 (1 decimal place)

The Coefficient of determination R² = 0.8477 = 0.848 ( 3 decimal place).

The Coefficient of determination gives the proportion of explained variance.

About 84.8% percent variation in annual sales can be explained by years of experience of the sales person.

Using the regression equation :

ŷ = 3.46061X + 82.82967

Years of experience, x = 8

ŷ = 3.46061(8) + 82.82967 = 110.514

111 = (to the nearest whole number)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Solve (2x + y) (2x - y)
    6·2 answers
  • Background information: This is an excerpt from an investigative report commissioned by the United Nations.
    9·2 answers
  • Cards numbered 1 through 15 are mixed up and placed in a bag. Malik chooses one of the cards without looking. What is the probab
    5·2 answers
  • 4 1/2 divided by 1 5/7 =
    15·1 answer
  • Given: f(x) = 3 - X; g(x) = -2x<br> Find g[f(x)]
    9·1 answer
  • Round 2.972 to the nearest hundredth
    11·1 answer
  • What is the vertex and range of the graph
    7·1 answer
  • Show all work for each problem. Please show how you estimated your product.<br> 0.12×105
    13·1 answer
  • Find the area of a triangle with a base length of 4 units and a height of 5 units.
    15·2 answers
  • Write an equation perpendicular to y=5/2x-3 and through (4,2).
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!