1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
krek1111 [17]
1 year ago
14

The figure below is not drawn to scale. ABCD is a parallelogram, Find

Mathematics
1 answer:
Butoxors [25]1 year ago
4 0

\angle BAD=100^{\circ} (opposite angles in a parallelogram)

\angle EAD=80^{\circ} (subtraction)

\angle ADE=65^{\circ} (angles in a triangle add to 180 degrees)

\angle CDA=80^{\circ} (adjacent angles in a parallelogram are supplementary)

\boxed{\angle CDE=15^{\circ}} (subtraction)

\angle CED=65^{\circ} (angles in a triangle add to 180 degrees)

\boxed{\angle AEB=80^{\circ}} (angles on a straight line add to 180 degrees)

You might be interested in
A set of electric toothbrush prices are normally distributed with a mean of 87 dollars and a standard deviation of
Studentka2010 [4]

Answer:

The proportion of electric toothbrush prices are between 104.60 dollars and 108.20 dollars is 0.0099

Step-by-step explanation:

A set of electric toothbrush prices are normally distributed with a mean of 87 dollars and a standard deviation of  8 dollars.

Mean = \mu = 87

Standard deviation = \sigma = 8

We are supposed to find proportion of electric toothbrush prices are between 104.60 dollars and 108.20 dollars i.e.P(104.60<x<108.20)

Z=\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}

At x = 104.60

Z=\frac{104.60-87}{8}

Z= 2.2

At x=108.20

Z=\frac{108.20-87}{8}

Z= 2.65

Refer the z table for p value :

P(x<108.20)-P(x<104.60)=P(Z<2.65)-P(Z<2.2)=0.9960-0.9861=0.0099

Hence The proportion of electric toothbrush prices are between 104.60 dollars and 108.20 dollars is 0.0099

4 0
3 years ago
Consider the sequence: 3, 8, 13, 18, 23, ...The recursive formula for this sequence is:an = an-1 + 5In a COMPLETE sentence, expl
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

a_8=38

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Recursive sequence </u>

In a recursive sequence formula, each term a_n is computed as a function of one or more previous terms. In the formula

a_n=a_{n-1}+5

n is the number of the term we want to calculate. If n=8, then the formula becomes

a_8=a_{7}+5

We can see a_{n-1} is the previous term. It means we need a_7 to be able to compute a_8. But we also need a_6 to compute a_7 and so on until some known data is reached. The question provides five terms, a_5=23.

a_6=a_5+5=28

a_7=a_6+5=33

a_8=a_7+5=38

a_8=38

4 0
3 years ago
A uniform beam of length L = 7.30m and weight = 4.45x10²N is carried by two ovorkers , Sam and Joe - Determine the force exert e
Mama L [17]

Answer:

Effort and distance = Load  x distance

7.30 x 4.45x10^2N = 3.2485 X 10^3N

We then know we can move 3 points to the right and show in regular notion.

= 3248.5

Divide by 2 = 3248.5/2 = 1624.25 force

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of a Second Class Lever as attached diagram shows proof to formula below.

Load x distance d1 = Effort x distance (d1 + d2)

The the load in the wheelbarrow shown is trying to push the wheelbarrow down in an anti-clockwise direction whilst the effort is being used to keep it up by pulling in a clockwise direction.

If the wheelbarrow is held steady (i.e. in Equilibrium) then the moment of the effort must be equal to the moment of the load :

Effort x its distance from wheel centre = Load x its distance from the wheel centre.

This general rule is expressed as clockwise moments = anti-clockwise moments (or CM = ACM)

 

This gives a way of calculating how much force a bridge support (or Reaction) has to provide if the bridge is to stay up - very useful since bridges are usually too big to just try it and see!

The moment of the load on the beam (F) must be balanced by the moment of the Reaction at the support (R2) :

Therefore F x d = R2 x D

It can be seen that this is so if we imagine taking away the Reaction R2.

The missing support must be supplying an anti-clockwise moment of a force for the beam to stay up.

The idea of clockwise moments being balanced by anti-clockwise moments is easily illustrated using a see-saw as an example attached.

We know from our experience that a lighter person will have to sit closer to the end of the see-saw to balance a heavier person - or two people.

So if CM = ACM then F x d = R2 x D

from our kitchen scales example above 2kg x 0.5m = R2 x 1m

so R2 = 1m divided by 2kg x 0.5m

therefore R2 = 1kg - which is what the scales told us (note the units 'm' cancel out to leave 'kg')

 

But we can't put a real bridge on kitchen scales and sometimes the loading is a bit more complicated.

Being able to calculate the forces acting on a beam by using moments helps us work out reactions at supports when beams (or bridges) have several loads acting upon them.

In this example imagine a beam 12m long with a 60kg load 6m from one end and a 40kg load 9m away from the same end n- i.e. F1=60kg, F2=40kg, d1=6m and d2=9m

 

CM = ACM

(F1 x d1) + (F2 x d2) = R2 x Length of beam

(60kg x 6m) + (40Kg x 9m) = R2 x 12m

(60kg x 6m) + (40Kg x 9m) / 12m = R2

360kgm + 360km / 12m = R2

720kgm / 12m = R2

60kg = R2 (note the unit 'm' for metres is cancelled out)

So if R2 = 60kg and the total load is 100kg (60kg + 40kg) then R1 = 40kg

4 0
2 years ago
Which equation is the inverse of y = 16x2 + 1?
Llana [10]

Answer:

y=\frac{\sqrt{x-1} }{4}

Step-by-step explanation:

The given equation is

y=16x^2+1

For this function to have an inverse, we must restrict the domain, say x\ge0

We interchange x and y to get,

x=16y^2+1


We now make y the subject to get;


x-1=16y^2


x-1=16y^2

We divide through by 16 to get;


\frac{x-1}{16}=y^2


We now take the square root of both sides to get;

\pm \sqrt{\frac{x-1}{16}}=y


y=\pm \frac{\sqrt{x-1} }{4}


Since  x\ge 0, the inverse function is


y=\frac{\sqrt{x-1} }{4}


6 0
3 years ago
Dale is standing 2x+7 feet from the base of a tower, the tower is 8x-4 feet tall. What is the distance between dale and the top
V125BC [204]

Answer:

6x - 11 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Dale is standing (2x + 7) feet height from the base of the tower.

And the tower is given to be (8x - 4)feet tall.

We have to find the distance between Dale and the top of the tower.

Now, the distance between dale and the top of the tower = height of the tower - height of Dale = (8x - 4) - (2x + 7) = (6x - 11) feet. (Answer)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 10 less than 222 is_.
    14·2 answers
  • If I have 5 X's and I take 2 X's away, how many X's<br> will I have left?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the y-intercept of the graph below?
    9·2 answers
  • The m∠B is two more than three times the measure of ∠C. If ∠B and ∠C are complementary angles, find the measures of both angles.
    9·1 answer
  • What is the domain and range of g(x) = |x-5|?
    10·1 answer
  • 16x-5=5+11x I really dont get these
    14·2 answers
  • There are approximately 330,000,000 cubic miles of water on Earth. A cubic mile is approximately 147,200,000,000 cubic feet. How
    11·1 answer
  • If micheal invests $2000 in the bank at a rate of 5.5% for 6 years how much interest will he make?
    9·2 answers
  • Pls help I’ll give 35 points
    10·1 answer
  • A recent study of 50 U.S. chess players details such things as the number of years the players have been active and the chess ra
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!