Answer:
a. required to pay a tax of $0.45 per gallon of gasoline sold.
Explanation:
The marginal external cost shows the difference between the private cost and the social cost. Also it should be the tax imposed amount. In the given case, the value is of $0.45 this represent that there is the tax of $0.45 that should be imposed on the producers in order to internalize the external cost
Therefore, the option a is correct
Answer: trading securities
Explanation:
An income statement is a company's financial statement and simply shows the revenues and the expenses of a company for a particular period. It shows how the company is doing whether it's running a loss or making profit.
The income statement reports changes in fair value for trading securities.
Answer:
The amount of revenue Finerly should recognize upon delivery to its distributors is $0.
Explanation:
From the question, the following two very important points can be observed:
1. Finerly expects the distributors to be able to sell the cosmetics, but is uncertain because it has little experience with selling cosmetics of this type.
2. Finerly is committed to accepting the cosmetics back from the distributors if the cosmetics are not sold.
Since there is an uncertainty that the the distributors will be able to sell the cosmetics and Finerly is committed to accepting them back from the distributors if they are not sold, these imply that the amount of sales revenue cannot be known or reasonably estimated until when the distributors actually sell the cosmetics.
Therefore, the amount of revenue Finerly should recognize upon delivery to its distributors is $0.
<span>First and foremost, it should be understood that Okun's Law is an empirical observation. The law is founded in a perceived relationship between gdp and unemployment. In this sense, Okun's Law is an approximation and not rightly a Law derived from theory.
There is some debate as to how much of a decrease in gdp actually occurs from an increase in unemployment, but two leading figures have offered estimations. Martin Prachowny gives the ratio 3:1, such that for every 1% increase in unemployment, a country's gdp drops by 3%. Ben Bernake more recently has offered a revised estimation, placing it closer to 2:1.
Therefore, to find the inverse, a country's GDP would have to grow by 2-3% in order to reduce unemployment by 1%.</span>
