Answer:
<h3>Edgewood IDS v. Kirby.</h3>
Explanation:
The Edgewood IDS v. Kirby was a monumental case concerning on the issue of proper and equal allocation of public school finance. The case was filed on May 23, 1984 at the Travis County by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund against William Kirby, commissioner of education.
The case was filed against the unequal and discriminatory funding of Edgewood Independent School District, San Antonio and other poor district public schools. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendant used unfair means in public school funding.
After numerous hearings, the court finally declared an unanimous decision in favor of the plaintiffs. As a result, Texas supreme court declared that the Texas constitution required that each school district be funded at approximately the same level.
Answer:
foot-in-the-door
Explanation:
Foot-in-the-door technique: The foot-in-the-door technique is also referred to as FITD. This technique is defined as an individual making or posing a small request formerly to be able to ask for the bigger request from another person later on.
Example: In the question above, as Jennifer is making a small request for a ride to a nearby store and later on she asked for a ride to the attorney's office.
In other words, this is one of the compliance strategy which is directed towards getting an individual to agree for a big request by having the individual agree to a small request first.
Answer:
The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. ... The Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and such number of Associate Justices as may be fixed by Congress.
The answer is, she most likely to live with her eldest son. In addition to late adulthood, According to socioemotional selectivity theory, shrinking social networks in adulthood are by choice. The older adults make the most of their emotional well-being by becoming progressively selective in their social contacts and interventions to control whether cognitive debility can be prohibited or even upturned caused in substantial development for a substantial proportion of individuals.
Limited authority and
local control.
