1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firlakuza [10]
2 years ago
9

which you will prove or disprove by conducting further research on the topic. As you look for answers, make sure to complete you

r research with historical ?
History
1 answer:
creativ13 [48]2 years ago
6 0

Through hypotheses, you will prove or disprove an argument by conducting further research on the topic.

When looking for answers to a hypothesis, it is necessary to complete your research with information and historical context for greater reliability in the work.

<h3 /><h3>How to carry out scientific research?</h3>

It is essential to use a rigorous scientific methodology for collecting, analyzing and manipulating data and information to prove a hypothesis.

For this, it is necessary to identify which type of research will be aligned with your project, whether it will be a qualitative or quantitative research for example.

Therefore, it is essential that each stage of the research is carried out using reliable sources and methods, with the necessary structuring and mastery of samples for reliability and relevance of your work.

Find out more about scientific research here:

brainly.com/question/17216882

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
How did the beating of senator sumner pull the nation apart
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer: On May 22, 1856, the "world's greatest deliberative body" became a combat zone. In one of the most dramatic and deeply ominous moments in the Senate's entire history, a member of the House of Representatives entered the Senate Chamber and savagely beat a senator into unconsciousness. The inspiration for this clash came three days earlier when Senator Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts antislavery Republican, addressed the Senate on the explosive issue of whether Kansas should be admitted to the Union as a slave state or a free state. In his "Crime Against Kansas" speech, Sumner identified two Democratic senators as the principal culprits in this crime—Stephen Douglas of Illinois and Andrew Butler of South Carolina. He characterized Douglas to his face as a "noise-some, squat, and nameless animal . . . not a proper model for an American senator."  Andrew Butler, who was not present, received more elaborate treatment. Mocking the South Carolina senator's stance as a man of chivalry, the Massachusetts senator charged him with taking "a mistress . . . who, though ugly to others, is always lovely to him; though polluted in the sight of the world, is chaste in his sight—I mean," added Sumner, "the harlot, Slavery." Representative Preston Brooks was Butler's South Carolina kinsman. If he had believed Sumner to be a gentleman, he might have challenged him to a duel. Instead, he chose a light cane of the type used to discipline unruly dogs. Shortly after the Senate had adjourned for the day, Brooks entered the old chamber, where he found Sumner busily attaching his postal frank to copies of his "Crime Against Kansas" speech. Moving quickly, Brooks slammed his metal-topped cane onto the unsuspecting Sumner's head. As Brooks struck again and again, Sumner rose and lurched blindly about the chamber, futilely attempting to protect himself. After a very long minute, it ended. Bleeding profusely, Sumner was carried away.  Brooks walked calmly out of the chamber without being detained by the stunned onlookers. Overnight, both men became heroes in their respective regions. Surviving a House censure resolution, Brooks resigned, was immediately reelected, and soon thereafter died at age 37. Sumner recovered slowly and returned to the Senate, where he remained for another 18 years. The nation, suffering from the breakdown of reasoned discourse that this event symbolized, tumbled onward toward the catastrophe of civil war.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was a result of the arms race between the united states and soviet union during president eisenhower's term apex?
Scorpion4ik [409]

The United States and the Soviet Union began building up their military forces very quickly.

This led to a nuclear arms race whereby the two countries competed for supremacy in nuclear warfare. The result was that each acquired enough warfare to completely destroy the other resulting in a Mutually Assured Destruction state of affairs

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1st armored division order of battle ww2
navik [9.2K]

The 1AD was the first armored division of the United States' Army to see battle in World War II.

<h3>What is the 1st armored division?</h3>

In 2003, the division became the largest division-based task force in US. Army History.

The armored division was involves in the Korean War, Cuban Missile Crisis, Persian Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan war etc.

In conclusion, the 1AD was the first armored division of the United States' Army to see battle in World War II.

Read more about 1st armored division

<em>brainly.com/question/7069876</em>

#SPJ11

3 0
2 years ago
In what way was Spartan government like an oligarchy?
viktelen [127]

The Spartan Government acted like oligarchy because there was a Spartan council.

The oligarchy is a form of government where certain people controlled power . The citizens had little or no say at all at the decision of the government .

Sparta gave very much importance to military discipline and acted almost like an army state.

The oligarchy of Sparta was quite successful and it became one of the most famous and well disciplined states in the whole ancient world.  

Due to the oligarchy there were certain positive points also because unlike it's twin city state Athens , the Spartan women almost enjoyed the same rights with men.

To know more about Oligarchy of Sparta here

brainly.com/question/1407857

# SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Which group of native arkansas used northwestern arkansas as its traditional hunting grounds?
wlad13 [49]

The correct answer is - Osage.

The Osage tribe is a Native American tribe that has had a territory in what is now Arkansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, and Kansas. The tribe has its roots as back as 900 BC, and it is closely related with the tribes like the Quapaw, Caddo, Wichita. They have had a turbulent history, with ups and downs, occasionally losing or abandoning territory because of wars with other tribes, or moving into new territories when they were the stronger side. They faced a big problem with the Iroquois that were moving in from the northeast around a couple of centuries ago, but managed to hold their ground, and actually became the strongest and most dominant tribe in the area.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Zhou system of decentralized government, in which rule was conducted by landowners who owed loyalty and military service to
    5·1 answer
  • Which answer best describes the South in the early 1800s?
    13·2 answers
  • Anti-Semitism began during which period?
    11·1 answer
  • the rise of the merchant class and the growth of towns and cities as a result of trade occurred due to the deterioration of whic
    10·2 answers
  • true or false: Mexico's government prior to the year 2000 can be characterized as stable, with multiple political parties winnin
    15·1 answer
  • Why in part did elie wiesel won the nobel peace prize in 1986?
    8·1 answer
  • The twentirs was a time of_____because Americans enjoyed_____​
    10·1 answer
  • How do invasive species impact an environment?
    7·1 answer
  • nepalko parkritik soundarya bayan gardai bidesi mitrwlai Nepal ghumnw auney anurodh gardai euta patrw lekhnu hos​
    11·1 answer
  • How many peopple killed in perryville earthquake 2021
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!