With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
<span>The terms outlined severe economic consequences for Germany.
One of those conditions was they had to pay severe reparations (ie a lot of money) to the winning side. </span>
He thinks the spirit of parties are the worst because, “It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.” A government with great power is prone to abuse it, a government needs to distribute the powers so no part of the government is strong enough to over power the other.
<span>"C. Make a list of both pros and cons on the issue and then weigh them" Do this because then you have two sides to an issue and you follow this information as one outweighs the other and informs an audience.</span>
Answer:
It depends on what the candidate is running for.
Explanation:
Local office? Likely not. President? Absolutely. It really depends on what type of candidate they are.
