Which part of the chemical equation is incorrect

1 answer:

3 0

The part of the chemical equation is incorrect is The solution is 10 02, it ought to de 1302.For carbon, on each aspects, there are eight carbon atoms.For hydrogen, on each aspects there are 20 hydrogen atoms.

<h3>What a part of a chemical equation are you able to by no means alternate?</h3>

When you stability an equation you could most effectively alternate the coefficients (the numbers in the front of molecules or atoms). Coefficients are the numbers in the front of the molecule. Subscripts are the smaller numbers observed after atoms. These can not be modified while balancing chemical equations.

The complete question is Which part of the chemical equation is incorrect which is 2C4H10+ 10O2 - 8CO2+10H2O.

To realize if a response is properly balanced among the reactants and the products, you need to calculate the wide variety of atoms of every detail on each aspect of the response and to test if they may be equal.
For oxygen, there are 20 oxygen atoms withinside the reagents and 26 withinside the products, so it's miles essential to grow the wide variety of oxygen withinside the reactants (with out touching the others). For this we positioned thirteen 02 withinside the reactants rather than 10, to have 26 oxygen atoms on every side.

You might be interested in

Darwin was spurred to finally publish his theory of natural selection by the writings of which scientist?. A.Lyall. B.Hutton. C.

velikii [3]

I believe is was C. Wallace

4 0

4 years ago

Why are the beak sizes and shapes of Darwin’s finches different?

maria [59]

Answer:

Adaptation

Explanation:

Some beaks made it easier for the type of food that bird was trying to get, for example the sharper the beak the better it could possible break a nut

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why should you always keep materials at least 6 inches inside the edge of a

VashaNatasha [74]

The answer is D hope this helps

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why do some organisms reproduce asexually?

Slav-nsk [51]

Not sure but my best guess is to go with B. It just makes the most sense.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When the nucleus of a fully differentiated carrot cell is injected into a frog egg whose nucleus has been removed, the injected

Alexxandr [17]

In this case, it is given that the nucleus of the carrot cell is injected into the frog's egg lacking nucleus. In this case, the recipient egg (frog egg) would not be able to produce the carrot. Every species differ from from each other, sometimes, mating between closely related species can produce hybrid offspring, but frog and carrot cannot be combined at all in any aspect.

The carrot is a plant and the frog is an animal. All the physiological processes vary a lot in between plant and the animal. Hence, this growth would not be supported. So, it is impossible to generate a carrot by inserting it's nucleus in the frog's cell.

5 0

3 years ago