Which part of the chemical equation is incorrect

1 answer:

3 0

The part of the chemical equation is incorrect is The solution is 10 02, it ought to de 1302.For carbon, on each aspects, there are eight carbon atoms.For hydrogen, on each aspects there are 20 hydrogen atoms.

<h3>What a part of a chemical equation are you able to by no means alternate?</h3>

When you stability an equation you could most effectively alternate the coefficients (the numbers in the front of molecules or atoms). Coefficients are the numbers in the front of the molecule. Subscripts are the smaller numbers observed after atoms. These can not be modified while balancing chemical equations.

The complete question is Which part of the chemical equation is incorrect which is 2C4H10+ 10O2 - 8CO2+10H2O.

To realize if a response is properly balanced among the reactants and the products, you need to calculate the wide variety of atoms of every detail on each aspect of the response and to test if they may be equal.
For oxygen, there are 20 oxygen atoms withinside the reagents and 26 withinside the products, so it's miles essential to grow the wide variety of oxygen withinside the reactants (with out touching the others). For this we positioned thirteen 02 withinside the reactants rather than 10, to have 26 oxygen atoms on every side.

You might be interested in

Using EEGs, researchers try to identify __________ while subjects are engaged in different tasks. A. brain patterns B. mental ca

marusya05 [52]

Answer:

Brain patterns

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Dna replication is called semiconservative because _______________ of the original double-helix appears in one daughter strand f

Tamiku [17]

I believe the answer is this:
DNA replication is called semi-conservative because half of the original double-helix appears in one daughter strand formed in replication if you need any more help then please comment and let me know ok. :)

7 0

3 years ago

Why would you learn less about an organism if it is were isolated from its surroundings than if you were able to observe the sam

Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

this one`s been up for debate for awhile now.

1. it depends on the organism

learning about an organism could be considered 'easier' to study in different ways. for example, if you are studying marine life, you will most likely have to keep it in a water habitat to watch it alive. If you are studying a land species, then watching from it`s natural habitat will give you more accurate results. sometimes the environment can affect an organisms internal systems more than you may think. this leads into my second point.

2. it depends on what you are trying to study

if you are trying to learn about the mating process, seasonal activity, migration, or external behavior, then monitoring it from it`s natural habitat or an area that is a close copy is your best option. but if you are looking into studying internal organs/systems or cells, then in <em>most</em> cases, the organism will need to be taken out of its natural habitat. only in very careful situations is it left in a habitat during examination.

5 0

2 years ago

Amoeba Sisters

Kisachek [45]

Answer and Explanation

Due to technical problems, I was not able to fill the answer and explanations in the corresponding boxes. You will find them in the attached files.

Download pdf

5 0

2 years ago

Reasons why humans aren't herbivores and are omnivores.

Kay [80]

Because humans eat both plants and meat