There were several instances during the colonial or Revolutionary Era where enslaved people attempted revolt or fight to their own independence. The first nation where a slave uprising was successful was <u>Haiti</u>.
The <u>rebellion </u>resulted in the creation of brutal slave codes that would not be lifted until after the Civil War.
Haiti is an antillean country in America located in the Caribbean Sea. Haiti stands out worldwide for being the first country in which slavery was abolished in 1804, after achieving its independence from France.
This revolution influenced the thinking of the slaves in the other American nations. However, the rulers became more restrictive to avoid the rebelion of the slaves.
According to the above, the complete paragraph would be:
There were several instances during the colonial or Revolutionary Era where enslaved people attempted revolt or fight to their own independence. The first nation where a slave uprising was successful was <u>Haiti</u>.
The <u>rebelion </u>resulted in the creation of brutal slave codes that would not be lifted until after the Civil War.
Answer:
Paul said that the Gentiles will listen to the message of Salvation, to the leading men of the Jews.
Explanation:
The reference of this instance can be found in the book of Acts 28:17-31.
<u>After the ship, on which Paul was traveling, was wintered on an island, he was taken to Rome. So, when he arrived there he called the leaders of Jews to preach the message of salvation, that comes from believing in Christ. After Paul explained to them the message of Christ, some Jews believed on the message while others rejected</u>.
To this Paul said to the leading men of the Jews that the message of salvation will be listened by Gentiles. [Acts 28:28] (Paul was appointed by God to preach among the Gentiles.)
Thus according to Paul, Gentiles will listen to the message of salvation.
All the statements were results of the Glorious Revolution except: <span>C.England became a democracy based on universal manhood suffrage. </span>
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another. This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.
John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience. Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.
Further explanation:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Because The United States wanted to promote the spread of democracy throughout Latin America since their interest was involved
