1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir2022 [97]
2 years ago
12

Does the history of the American Revolution prove that owning small firearms is a way for citizens to defend themselves against

tyrannical governments
History
1 answer:
Yakvenalex [24]2 years ago
7 0

The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.

<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>

Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.

Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.

They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.

Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What came after the British policies limit colonial rights?
kap26 [50]
Backlash and rebellion from colonists which led to the American Revolution.
6 0
3 years ago
Match each outcome with a weakness of the Articles of Confederation.
Masteriza [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Congress was not given any power to tax the people

No taxes=no money to run the country

2. Congress had no power to enforce its own laws in the states

No enforcement=people in various states doing what they want

3. Congress could not make states follow trade agreements with other nations

Bad trading relations with other counties = no international trade

4. Congress could not regulate trade between the states.

High trading taxes between states = difficulty trading goods = slow business = lost jobs

5. Citizens in states thought their property rights were being violated

Violated property rights = need for national government to check the states

6. There was no national court system

No national court system = different systems by state = confusion in the justice system Interstate issues would have no courts to go to on the federal level No means of checking the laws of the legislature

7. There was no executive branch for the central government

This means there was no President or party responsible for enforcing laws; no authority behind the laws There was no figure head for the government No means of checking the policies created by the legislature (what happens when all power is in one branch of government?)

8. It required a unanimous vote to make changes to the Articles

This made it very difficult to make any changes to the Articles

9. Many farmers lost their farms and homes; some were even put in prison As a result, local farmers, led by Daniel Shays decided to rebel by shutting down the courts using force - they even raided a federal arsenal to take weapons for their rebellion

The purpose of this meeting was "for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation"...but they ended up creating a new U.S. Constitution.

4 0
2 years ago
Hindi president of India ​
kolezko [41]

Answer:

The president of India is <u>Ram</u><u> </u><u>Nath</u><u> </u><u>Kovind</u><u>.</u>

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What impact did satellites have on modern life?
AURORKA [14]

Answer:

Satellites increased the speed of global communications.

Explanation:

Satellites speeded up the global communications, all communication that before of this had to travel great distances and was electricly transportated thru a wire now had the chance to be just broadcasted from and to a satellite, you could have global communication worldwide.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After slavery was abolished, most white Southern planters
lianna [129]
Option A I THINK..........
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the Qin dynasty best reflect Legalist principles?
    13·2 answers
  • Which is NOT a reason for Spain's sending of the Spanish Armada to England?
    6·1 answer
  • In the 1920s, both Fascists in Italy and Communists in Russia shared the belief that
    11·1 answer
  • What general cut off Tecumseh's retreat into Canada?
    8·1 answer
  • Most railroads made money to build new track selling land that had been given to them by the government.
    8·2 answers
  • How did Descartes’s approach to science differ from Bacon’s?
    11·1 answer
  • The British and the colonists had many conflicts in the time before the American Revolution. What conclusion can be made about w
    12·1 answer
  • How was social life in New England different than the rest of the colonies?
    15·1 answer
  • Who won the war in 1812​
    11·1 answer
  • How did Japan use ideas from China's civilization?<br> I NEEEED THEM ASAP PLEASEEEEEE
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!