Question

In which scenario might the defendant refer to the Supreme Court's reversal of a guilty verdict based on probable cause as happened in the case Weeks v. United States?
A.
A woman is tried by jury for a serious crime based on evidence found in her home which was searched without a warrant.
B.
A member of an American Indian nation argues that he is allowed to participate in tribal fishing practices despite US administrative laws.
C.
A juvenile driver is arrested after a car accident, and the police officer refuses to tell the driver why she is being arrested.
D.
A man who has been waiting for trial for more than two years wants his case considered by an appellate court instead of the trial court.

Answer 1

A. A woman is tried by jury for a serious crime based on evidence found in her home which was searched without a warrant.

Weeks v. us, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), was a us Supreme Court case within which the Court nem con command that the warrantless seizure of things from a non-public residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth change to the U.S. Constitution

In a unanimous call, the Court command that the seizure of things from Weeks' residence directly profaned his constitutional rights. The Court additionally command that the government's refusal to come Weeks' possessions profaned the Fourth change.

Weeks was charged in administrative division court with the employment of the mails to move coupons or tickets representing possibilities or shares in an exceedingly lottery. The district court denied Weeks' pretrial petition to suppress the proof condemned within the warrantless searches of his space and to possess the condemned property came to him.

Warrantless searches or seizure of any personal property is not acceptable.

Learn more about US Supreme Court here: brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ10