1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondor19780726 [428]
3 years ago
6

Explain in your own words what Washington in his Farewell Address meant by the threat of the "spirit of party"

History
2 answers:
wolverine [178]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

What Washington called "the spirit of party" was, he claimed, "inseparable from our culture, having its origin in the greatest impulses of the human mind "— namely, the tribal desire to divide the world into" we "vs." they, "into competitor and opposing classes. This spirit can then easily become a desire to see winning "our side," irrespective of whether our side is better than "their side," irrespective of the issues involved or the facts of the matter.

Tanya [424]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Political parties. You know. Like what we are seeing in Congress now, where government is paralyzed because each side is more concerned about partisan politics than about the people.</span>
You might be interested in
Which describes the effect of militarism in the years leading up to World War I?
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

Countries built large armies and stockpiled powerful weapons.

Explanation:

In an effort to hold onto their territorial as well as world colonies and might, many European nations expanded their military industries and armies, as well as expanded colonial rule and spheres of influence wherever they could. This led to countries drawing recruits and forcing colonies to produce war material for the host nation during World War I.

~

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the geographic location of the United States
Mekhanik [1.2K]
Borders canada and mexico and the pacific and the atlantic
3 0
2 years ago
What three things helped the tang dynasty to have a very successful foreign trade system
Darina [25.2K]
The three things that helped the Tang Dynasty was:

Silk road, trading colonies and shipbuilind.

The silk road was a trading routes connecting the East and West. 

The trading colonies dealt with cotton, rice, tobacco, indigo (dye), lumber, furs, and farm products; that is what most of the people traded back in the tang dynasty. They will trade these things for food, clothing, books, medicine and sometime homes. 

The shipbuilding made a huge part because the people would build ships to trade things to different lands. Usually when they trade more things to different lands they'll get more money. 

Hope this helped :)
have a great day 
5 0
2 years ago
What became a significant threat to church power as a result of the great western schism?.
expeople1 [14]

The Great Western Schism was a split within the Catholic Church that lasted from 1378 to 1417. The schism was caused by a conflict between two papal claimants, one in Rome and the other in Avignon. The schism led to a decline in the authority of the papacy and a increase in the power of secular rulers.

The Great Western Schism also caused a decline in the power of the Catholic Church in Europe. The schism weakened the Church's authority and made it easier for secular rulers to challenge Church power. The schism also made it difficult for the Church to respond effectively to the problems of the time, such as the Hussite heresy.

The schism also had a negative impact on the Church's finances. The papacy was no longer able to collect revenues from all of Christendom, and this led to a decline in the Church's income. The schism also made it difficult for the Church to raise funds for its activities, such as missionary work.

The Great Western Schism was a significant threat to church power because it weakened the Church's authority, made it easier for secular rulers to challenge Church power, and had a negative impact on the Church's finances.

8 0
11 months ago
What policies or actions enabled the communists to defeat the nationalists in their long civil war?
Anon25 [30]
Pretty much, the Communists were much stronger than the Nationalists. Their public support was strong due to promised land reform for peasants and their military organization was more experienced. The Nationalists had weak, public support and their military was ineffective, corrupt leadership and poor morale. They were an easy beat.
Hope this helps :)
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1.<br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Csqrt%7B49%7D%20" id="TexFormula1" title=" \sqrt{49} " alt=" \sqrt{49} " align="abs
    10·1 answer
  • How many nations are members of the United Nations?
    9·2 answers
  • Who killed Adolf hitler
    14·2 answers
  • ApWh:Define Popol Vuh
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following reasons is the best possible explanation for the changes in Europe's population since 1750?
    13·2 answers
  • In the 1850s the United States become especially concerned about Latin American countries because​
    9·2 answers
  • What was steerage?
    10·1 answer
  • CLASSICAL REPUBLICANISM
    13·1 answer
  • What was hitlers impression of Mussolini?
    8·1 answer
  • The middle east is best associated with which internationally traded product? electronics bananas manufactured goods oil.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!