1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
never [62]
3 years ago
10

What damage does a tornado do to a house?

Social Studies
1 answer:
sergey [27]3 years ago
8 0
It destroys and breaks down households leaving land deintegrated 
You might be interested in
Which of the following tools helps a producer set up an efficient system of
svp [43]

Answer:

A production possibilities frontier graph.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can you help me with some of the questions please?
denpristay [2]

Answer:

Gun range, girls underwear, all sorts of strange things. There was no hard evidence that he committed the crime which made it difficult to prosecute him.

Ivins was put under periodic surveillance and an FBI document stated that he was "an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks". On July 29, 2008, Ivins committed with an overdose of acetaminophen

The 77-page report from the Government Accountability Office says the FBI's research, including novel microbial forensic tests, did not provide a full understanding of how bacteria change in their natural environment and in a laboratory. This failure to grasp the reason for genetic mutations that were used to differentiate between samples of anthrax bacteria was a "key scientific gap" in the investigation, the report says.

The GAO also found a lack of rigorous controls over sampling procedures and a failure to cite the degree of uncertainty in measurement tools used to identify genetic markers.

"Although the complexity and novelty of the scientific methods at the time of the FBI's investigation made it challenging for the FBI to adequately address all these problems, the agency could have improved its approach," the report said.

The GAO report confirms what I have often said — that the FBI's definitive conclusions about the accuracy of their scientific findings in the Amerithrax case are not, in fact, definitive," Holt said in a written statement.

An acclaimed government scientist who assisted the federal investigation of the 2001 anthrax mailings said Tuesday that he erred seven years ago when he told top Bush administration officials that material he examined probably had been altered to make it more deadly.

The scientist, Peter B. Jahrling, had observed anthrax spores with the aid of an electron microscope at the government’s biological warfare research facility at Ft. Detrick, Md

Explanation:

The presence of silicon was viewed with alarm because the material, if artificially added to the anthrax, would make it more buoyant in air and more capable of penetrating deeply into the lungs.

“I believe I made an honest mistake,” Jahrling said in response to questions e-mailed to him for this article, adding that he had been “overly impressed” by what he thought he saw under the microscope.

“I should never have ventured into this area,” said Jahrling, who is a virologist, referring to his analysis of the anthrax, which is a bacterium. Jahrling’s initial analysis -- and his briefing of officials at the White House

At Tuesday’s hearing, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), pressed Mueller anew about how the silicon got into the spores.

After being informed of the events at the hearing, Jahrling renounced his earlier analysis.

“In retrospect,” Jahrling said, “I believe I was mistaken and defer to the experts.”

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which winner didn't agree with the punishments given in the Treaty of<br> Versailles? Why?
astraxan [27]

Answer:

In the end the Allies agreed that they would punish Germany and attempt to weaken that nation so much that it wouldn't pose a future threat.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
#dawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww​
Eva8 [605]

#dawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

5 0
3 years ago
What are the four variables Gilbert and Kahl used to develop a six-class model to reflect the class structure of the United Stat
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

education, power, property and prestige

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that four variables used to develop the six-class model were the following: education, power, property and prestige. The six-class model is a social class model that divides the population into the capitalist class, the upper middle class, the lower middle class, the working class, the working poor, and the underclass.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the best title for this graphic, which is about one method presidential candidates use to communicate with the public?
    10·2 answers
  • John says to his mother, “i will rake the leaves this afternoon. let’s leave soon for the store. we can store the leaves in the
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the colonists object to the Sugar Act, Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, ect?
    13·2 answers
  • What contributions did the Church make to politics, economics, and culture in medieval Europe?
    7·1 answer
  • Andy's new employer looks somewhat similar to a TV actor who played the role of a very dishonest politician. Without consciously
    11·1 answer
  • When Alex was growing up, his neighbor was a lawyer who wore Hawaiian print shirts and flip flops almost every day. His neighbor
    8·1 answer
  • The passing of Jim Crow laws in Tennessee
    5·1 answer
  • discuss how sports and cultural clubs can have positive influence on discipline in schools (25 marks)​
    10·1 answer
  • Help
    9·1 answer
  • What led both Herodotus and Thucydides to write history?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!