Answer:
Justices debate the importance of different cases.
Justices vote on which cases to review.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court is the highest Court in the United States. The Procedures adopted by the Justices in arriving at a just decision on cases involves deliberation on cases by weighing the quality of evidence or proof brought before it. During sittings, the justices hear cases and deliver rulings while during recess, they discuss cases and write opinions.
An attorney who wants to argue in the supreme court must have been qualified to practice law at the highest court of a state. The Justices will take a while to deliberate on the oral arguments of both Counsels. They do this at a conference of all Justices to discuss the case and vote on any new petitions. At this conference, each justice in order of most senior states cast their votes on a particular case.
The decisions of the supreme court are precedents that also bind the lower Courts.
Answer:
Elie Wiesel wanted to emphasize the extreme loss he experienced due to the Holocaust. By repeating the traditional prayer said after a loved one dies, he highlights the pain and suffering the Jewish people endured simply because of their religion. The use of a Jewish prayer also shows that Wiesel is proud of his Jewish roots and isn't afraid to let them show, despite the dangers of doing so.
<span>emotion-related cognitions is the answer</span>
The effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion is that It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for its actions. Option C
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?</h3>
Generally, If the Office's findings, conclusions, or recommendations have any legal implications, they must be handled by a Legal Expert, who may be an Advisor, Associate Advisor, Consultant, or another official with relevant credentials and expertise in the law.
In conclusion, By having legal experts on the panel, the interviewer is able to demonstrate how the system avoids accountability. C as a viable alternative
Read more about legal experts
brainly.com/question/1346208
#SPJ1
CQ
What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?
A. It discredits the impact of the Gault case on the juvenile justice system.
B. It reveals the positive changes to the system that the public ignores.
C. It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for their actions.
D. It offers insight into the state of the juvenile justice system.
Answer:The statement that accurately describes the culture or geography of Latin America is B.
Statement A says that communications were quick between cities in Spain's colonies, which is not true. In the 1800s, communications were not quick in general, but less in the Latin American colonies, where the extension of the territory meant that a letter from one city to another could take weeks to arrive.
Option C states that South America is bounded by the Pacific Ocean on the east coast, but that's not right. South America is bounded by the Pacific Ocean on the west coast, the east coast is bounded by the Atlantic Ocean.
The correct option is B. Indeed, the navigation between both ends of the Spanish territories in Latin America could take weeks, even more than a month. Considering that the northern end of the Spanish colonies was in California, and the extreme south reached approximately Santiago de Chile, it was a 6000-mile boat ride. It would take much more in the case of wanting to get from one ocean to another, for example, from California to Buenos Aires.
Explanation: hope this helped
